English Agent wrote:It does seem that Bond 23 will have its work cutout next year, against many films which will offer a great variety of genres for people to see.
Even if Bond 23 is very good, the fact that there will be so many offerings in the same month, will allow people to be distracted to see other films even just for curiosties sake.
I think that one of the reasons why November is picked by studios for a release date, is if the film is good and has legs to still attract an audience through the early-mid December period, then a film can pick up quite worthwhile grosses through the xmas and new year period, which for example CR managed to do, but QOS didn't.
Why do Bond films have to do global release at the same time, anyway. Surely there could be other strategies.
Any ideas here?
EA
The Christmas income point you made is absolutely right. The "over the holidays" release is convenient for that reason in general. But with all the movies being released? I don't quite get it. Oh dear God. WAIT! LMAO I just had it all wrong about Cavill's movie and the other ones. I looked at 2011 releases, not 2012!!! DUH DUH DUH. Stupid me!
SCRATCH all of it. Except Twilight that WILL be there. What the hell, I knew something was wrong when I kept going 2011 and not having seen before that Cavill was up against Bond. LMAO! Ugh. I apologize, I really am an idiot!
SO 2012 releases. (how I only realised now is beyond me, but whatever!
Ugh it's even WORSE in 2012. It's Bond 23 on Nov. 9 and BEFORE Bond, on Nov 2 is Monsters, Inc. 2. Then on Nov. 15 (so barely a week after Bond) there's Twilight (breaking Dawn part 2) and Nov 21 is Guardians and 47 Ronin. NOT TO MENTION "The Hobbit" and "Superman: Man of Steel". I thought it was bad considering 2011 releases but it's far worse with the 2012 ones.
About movies being released at the same time: they don't do that with Bond and it's just wrong. In Italy, France, Spain the movie is released months later, after it's been released in US and UK already, and it just doesn't work at all because by then anyone who speaks English has already found a way to see it or download a pirated version online. They used to do the separate release thing in the past but with digital technology and downloads and the internet (everyone is at the very least getting spoilers way in advance) it's absolutely stupid now to have different release times in different countries. Studios have specifically more and more geared towards "global release date" because it's simply not wise anymore to have separate release dates, if you want to rake in the profits and avoid piracy and illegal downloads, you've got to release it everywhere at the same time. They do NOT use this strategy with Bond, or at least they haven't so far. I am unsure about QoS but I don't think it was released here at the same time as the US and UK. It's all about the distributors and dubbing the movies. But the distributors mainly who provoque this type of problem. They need to get on it quick. Release it at the same time everywhere and be done with it.
I just think your idea about late spring or anyway Easter is the best solution EA. Especially with a movie that absolutely needs to perform well. And with the competition lined up, it's really going to be basically impossible to have a performance that is anywhere above "decent" IMO. They'd need a super sensational movie for that, and it just doesn't look like that will be the case, at least not for now.

