Daltonite Toothpaste wrote:bjmdds wrote:Why do you hate Cavill so much as a potential Bond Toothpaste?
I don't hate him, I don't even know him to hate him. He just comes off too much like a younger Brosnan, smarmy vibes and all. He may fit the Bond look more than Craig (but the hair colour isn't a problem for me), but just looking more like Bond than what we've been stuck with in CR/QOS/SF and SP, isn't enough for me. He needs the right amount of charm (not too much, not too little), intelligence, toughness and experience (unless the actor is a rookie Bond in thier mid 20's... not a 38 year old rookie Bond). And if his delivery wasn't robotic, that would be a welcome plus.
Now this is another reason I never warmed up to Brosnan (and don't particularly CARE about this Cavill fellow either, as
Man Of Stool didn't impress me anymore than
Say-U.N.C.L.E., whose main failing was that
I just didn't like ANY of the characters, especially the female lead who was all pouty and sulky.. But that's beside the point). All this
hype about how PB should've/could've/would've been the Perfect, Bestest James Bond Ever without actually DOING anything except look the part and being rather smug about it before even being cast in the role. IIRC, when
People magazine had the option to do a cover story on Timothy Dalton's debut in 1986-87, they instead ran a pity-party about how Poor Pierce was Cheated out of his Dream Job by the Big Bad Network making him stay on
Remington Steele and how it was soooo unfair, and Dalton was just a last-minute/second-rate choice, and blah blah blah. And this had the ugly backlash of undermining DALTON's run to the extent that MGM/UA did such a half-assed job promoting him because THEY would've preferred to have Brosnan all along and could only mourn the potential Hit-maker they
lost instead of taking advantage of the REAL opportunity they
had with Dalton's abilities and commitment as a Serious Actor.
Now granted, that $#!+ move by NBC/MTM Productions
was unfair*, and PB certainly deserved some consideration for that, BACK THEN. And the death of his first wife Cassandra Harris to cancer made it a LOT easier to feel sympathy for the man. But
after that? I don't think so. True, the apologists all claimed that because PB looked too young in 1986, that made his actual anointment with a more "mature" appearance for his early 40s more "appropriate" for the Bond character's age and experience. And with PB (then) actually a widower just like Bond, that made him even more "perfect" for all the serious, brooding stuff over personal loss that the scripts were gearing towards. But really, this all just ended up being an excuse
NOT pick on PB, to absolve him of any criticism for his shortcomings, and that to believe or express otherwise was just plain WRONG and BAD, so everyone should just leave him alone and accept him as the BEST Bond Since Connery and Better Than Moore. To that, I say bull$#!+. Because no matter how much
I was *told* to give PB's Bond a chance, I just
didn't like his Bond. He was too bland, smug, and poncy for me, making his quartet of already-mediocre movies
worse with a 'hero' I couldn't stand. And that's really all there was to it.
More and more, I'm actually wishing that had EON gotten their act together by 1992, they could've fulfilled Dalton's 3-movie contract by making his last appearance mark the Series'
30th Anniversary and it's
Conclusion, and leave it at that. When Terence Young was still alive, he once stated that he would only return to Direct the LAST Movie, which would've been intriguing, but impractical given his advanced age and how out-of-touch he would've been with the Modern Film-making techniques that John Glen barely managed to grasp in the 1980s (Young died in 1994). A better alternative would've been
Peter Hunt, who still had at least 10 years left by then (d: 2002), was practically Young's apprentice/successor in the Best Era of the 1960s (in terms of quality, style, and innovation), and deserved a second Bond movie to Direct with a REAL Actor like Dalton to bow out with. And OHMSS was pretty Goddamned impressive for a
debut, starring an unknown, NON-professional like George Lazenby to boot (who actually
didn't suck like the snotty "critics" too enamored with the Looming Shadow of Sean Connery claimed at the time). Now how incredible would THAT have been?
But that didn't happen, so I'll just have to deal with LTK as my default choice for the End of an Era. And use the 7 (soon
8) mediocre "Bond" movies of the last 20 years with two actors I don't dig to make the first 16 that much more valuable to me. Still, PB's presence does put one thing in perspective: as a lesser rerun of Roger Moore, it proved that Moore was there
before Brosnan and he was BETTER than Brosnan. And that's something to be thankful for, isn't it? And more happily, we're
allowed to mock and insult the Craggy's mumbly-moping, pouty-posing, incompetent-idiocy without any
guilt of how insensitive it is to his "private life" (which hasn't yet been *exploited* as a tool to make the public accept HIM as 007, probably because it would actually have the opposite effect if that were the case). And I LIKE making fun of the Craggy with my exaggerated recitals of his worst line ever (with full-blown pouty-face for emphasis):
"I'm motivated by my duty". So maybe there is something good to come out of this goof after all.
* - Additionally, NBC supposedly attempted a "compromise" with EON to delay production of the new season of RS to allow PB to film TLD, which would effectively have PB retaining both roles of Bond and Steele
at the same time. But Cubby vetoed that pie-in-the-sky idea, citing conflict-of-interest with audiences staying home to watch PB as Steele (while "imagining" him as Bond) on TV For Free instead of actually Paying Money to see their James Bond Movie in the Theatres (where PB would actually BE Bond) and reducing their Box-Office take. Hence, Cubby's direct quote of "James Bond Will Not Be Remington Steele and Remington Steele Will Not Be James Bond" that gave NBC the excuse to renew RS at that last minute and withhold PB from EON's hands out of spite over Cubby's territorial inflexibility (forgetting their own hypocrisy of only renewing an already-CANCELLED series because its Star suddenly became their Meal-Ticket as the Next James Bond to Exploit). Sure, Cubby "made it up" to PB later with GE, but that had to have f***ing hurt PB to
known how that initial rejection went down which probably made Cubby's minimal involvement in GE (and total ABSENCE from TND-DAD) a huge relief for PB. Still, didn't save him from Babs' when she took charge, but that's another story..