As much as I saw a similarity between DC's performance in CR and the Bourne/Bauer character's in terms of roguish attitude, it had never clicked that they share the same hairstyle.James wrote:Studios latch onto trends and what they perchive to be in-vogue. Bond has gone Bourne/Bauer. More of an everyman character. Hopefully it'll come full circle and we'll get a more Bondian Bond next time around.
I wont face it because, in my opinion, it isn't true. He's still tall and handsom. Maybe not model handsom like Brosnan, but still very handsom.carl stromberg wrote:Let's face it, Daniel Craig is a little too short and odd-looking to be Bond and miles away from the tall, handsome "stereotype" of Bond. But people seemed to welcome him because of this, and enjoyed the fact that James Bond has metamorphisised into some mad-looking thug.
I'd hardly call him short. He's only 2 inches shorter than Brosnan.carl stromberg wrote:Let's face it, Daniel Craig is a little too short and odd-looking to be Bond and miles away from the tall, handsome "stereotype" of Bond.
Or they've finally got an actor in the role, who has a better range than we've had in the last four filmsBut people seemed to welcome him because of this, and enjoyed the fact that James Bond has metamorphisised into some mad-looking thug.
Well no one expected Craig to win the role, so I'd say the next actor will be unexpected
Does this mean that the paradigm for how Bond looks has now been changed, and the next Bond after Craig will be another person you would not expect to play Bond?
Well handsome is a matter of opinion. As for being 6'2, well if Bond has to be this height (in your opinion) only *Connery, *Lazenby and *Dalton are worthy to play Bond.Or will people be bored with Craig's Bond and want some 6'2 handsome Bond with black hair?
Let's hope she doesn't go with......Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry wrote:Seeing as Barbara Broccoli wanted Sean Bean and cast Daniel Craig, I think she may go for another bizarre choice if she gets to choose another Bond.
