

I think if left in theaters TDKR will beat TDK, however the shooting and fights scared about lot away.English Agent wrote:Yes, in reality the new Bat film is doing extremely well, considering the awful shooting.......and now that the Olympics is on, i had almost forgotten that the film was out. I think the Olympics will distract potential cinemagoers to seeing the film in the next two weeks, as people sit at him cheering on their sportsmen and sportswomen! I think i will see the film, but it maybe a while yet.bjmdds wrote:"Warner Brothers’ $250 million sequel is an utterly HUGE movie.
It earned $64.1 million in its second weekend (a 60 percent drop).
It has grossed $289.1 million after ten days.
This total is less than the The Dark Knight had earned at the same point in its run ($313.8 million), and that’s fine.
This total is also less than the The Avengers had earned at the same point in its run ($373.1 million), and that’s also fine.
Overseas, the film has already grossed $248.2 million, and its headed for a finish between $900 million and $1 billion worldwide. That weekend drop indicates that Rises won’t have the same legs as The Dark Knight, which ultimately found $533.3 million, so a domestic finish in the $450 million range seems likely. Many who expected the film to earn Avengers-sized numbers are pointing to the tragic Aurora shooting as the main reason for the film’s lower-than-expected business, but at this point, I believe that word-of-mouth is a bigger factor. While the film scored an “A” CinemaScore grade, critical reviews are not nearly as strong, and Bane is a less dynamic/marketable villain than Heath Ledger’s Joker. Still, as I keep reiterating, Dark Knight Rises is an enormous hit." "The opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympics scored the event's biggest U.S. TV audience ever. NBC's telecast of the event drew a massive 40.7 million viewers, topping the 1996 Atlanta opening ceremony (39.8 million) as the most-watched beginning to a summer games since they were first televised in 1960." (This most likely affected Friday's USA TDNR totals too and will be little factor going forward now.)
I hope Bond 23 fades faster than QOS, especially here in the US.bjmdds wrote:Coming from YOU how can Eon think they are doing it right? CR lasted 18 weeks in theaters. QOS only lasted a paltry 11 weeksbefore Eon yanked it. DAD lasted 23 weeks in theatres in 2002
FBF, what say yee about that statistical tidbit?
Enough with the FSTF. Khan is not in Trek 2 so I will be seeing the sequel.bjmdds wrote:Great news FSTF.
We need more than vampires and Bilbo to do all the work. Your friend Jackman's Les Miserables will be on the same day as Bilbo's adventure. Rise of the Guardian will bring in kids and families on the Thanksgiving week.Round one seals Cr-egg's film's fate this November internationally then in December in the USA.
That and Bilbo avatar.FSTF, will you change![]()
![]()
your iconically known and revered signature picture to Bilbo Baggins soon?
bjmdds wrote:Are you sure there is no Khan or are they teasing us?
Otherwise, send in the weirdos for Bond.After weekend one, Bond 23 will have PLENTY of competition..........let's hope weekend 1 underperforms for Bond 23.
Is there enough story in The Hobbit for three movies? It's a pretty slender book compared to LOTR. I thought even splitting it into two was bad enough.FormerBondFan wrote:Looks like we're going to have a third Hobbit.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/t ... med-355817
More Middle Earth, less Bond.
Jackson says Tolkien was going to rewrite the Hobbit before he died to match LOTR in tone and detail, he didn't but Jackson has 125 pages of whatever so he is going to rewrite the Hobbit to make it match his trilogy. 3 movies? Jackson can put a lot of detail in as his extended editions show still 3 movies out of one book seems to be milking the audience hard. I hope the hobbit is good enough to make two more movies out of it I feel it will be one too many movies but mainly too long between stories.Kristatos wrote:Is there enough story in The Hobbit for three movies? It's a pretty slender book compared to LOTR. I thought even splitting it into two was bad enough.FormerBondFan wrote:Looks like we're going to have a third Hobbit.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/t ... med-355817
More Middle Earth, less Bond.
Does it matter? They keep reacting to internet leaks like this there will be nothing left to tell. Something get a spoilers so it ends up in the trailer? What sense does that make most people will never see the spoilers so why give it away. Its like movies that give away the best action sequences for free int the ads.Kristatos wrote:The full trailer is out at 2pm today. As you can see, Daniel Craig is c**k-a-hoop with excitement.
I just watched the international trailer which has a few new bits. I was surprised at the palm print gun gadget. Didn't Timothy Dalton get one of those in 1989! That's hardly a new idea. DC floating in the water feels straight out of the first and last Bourne films. Bond fakes his death. MI6 is attacked. More motorbike capers (yawn). Feels like we've seen this all before. They seem to have started giving most of the plot away but my money is on at least one surprise bizarre Craig era twist in this film that tramples all over anything by Ian Fleming or Cubby Broccoli.Omega wrote:Seriously do these people not know how to either keep a secret or promote a movie?
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDJ9Jtzs ... r_embedded[/video]
This is a spoiler relieved in internet forums when the studio lost the what was it board art which was later sold on ebay but most people didn't know about it so now they offer a piss poor teaser giving away what could of been a shocker.
James wrote:I just watched the international trailer which has a few new bits. I was surprised at the palm print gun gadget. Didn't Timothy Dalton get one of those in 1989! That's hardly a new idea. DC floating in the water feels straight out of the first and last Bourne films. Bond fakes his death. MI6 is attacked. More motorbike capers (yawn). Feels like we've seen this all before. They seem to have started giving most of the plot away but my money is on at least one surprise bizarre Craig era twist in this film that tramples all over anything by Ian Fleming or Cubby Broccoli.Omega wrote:Seriously do these people not know how to either keep a secret or promote a movie?
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDJ9Jtzs ... r_embedded[/video]
This is a spoiler relieved in internet forums when the studio lost the what was it board art which was later sold on ebay but most people didn't know about it so now they offer a piss poor teaser giving away what could of been a shocker.
By the way, what's with Craig's voice. He sounds like he's been sedated and can barely speak.
Correct James. The writers and Mendes stole concepts from other films and spliced them together thinking the audience will not notice the obvious. Don't forget the final top of the train fight scene in Mission Impossible I with the lost N.O.C. list as well. I GUARANTEE you the reviews of this film by critics will expose this as an obvious retread of the past films. It looks worse than imaginable. No escapism and putrid casting choices. It's a meltdown of the franchise. It cannot go on in this fashion any longer. FBF, IF this trash grosses a dime more than CR, never mind QOS, it will state a deterioration of the global psyche to embrace such rubbish. EVERYTHING about this film is wrong, from morbid pre-made plot ripoffs to a director who will be embarrassed by his final product, as was Forster.James wrote:I just watched the international trailer which has a few new bits. I was surprised at the palm print gun gadget. Didn't Timothy Dalton get one of those in 1989! That's hardly a new idea. DC floating in the water feels straight out of the first and last Bourne films. Bond fakes his death. MI6 is attacked. More motorbike capers (yawn). Feels like we've seen this all before. They seem to have started giving most of the plot away but my money is on at least one surprise bizarre Craig era twist in this film that tramples all over anything by Ian Fleming or Cubby Broccoli.Omega wrote:Seriously do these people not know how to either keep a secret or promote a movie?
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDJ9Jtzs ... r_embedded[/video]
This is a spoiler relieved in internet forums when the studio lost the what was it board art which was later sold on ebay but most people didn't know about it so now they offer a piss poor teaser giving away what could of been a shocker.
By the way, what's with Craig's voice. He sounds like he's been sedated and can barely speak.