Found a few funny replies to cregg mitchell on him staying on
Terrible news..Craig is more Eastenders than Bond..We need another Connery or Moore the Best Bonds of all time. Craig has neither the look the class the charm or indeed the humour needed for this role.
Bond requires style, class, sophitication and to be super smooth, sorry this new guy aint got it.....he just aint.
I guess it depends on what you expect from Bond, I dont want a book copy they should do what they have been doing and lose the new guy, he's rubbnish in my book.
Goldeneye still the best!!
I disagree with Wilson's assessment of Craig's portrayal of Bond. Craig may be an excellent actor, but he's not 'Bond' -- to the point where my friends and I left the theatre part way through his first outing as the iconic character. Of course, they already had our money.
It may just have been the way it was presented, too, and nothing to do with Craig. Hard to tell, when you're sitting in the theatre getting more bored and disgusted.
They left David Niven off the list of Bonds, too.
Brosnan was the best of the best! Craig is somewhere after Timothy Dalton....
I dont want to see anymore of him...bring back Pierce brosnan...
poor very poor this guy has no charm! we need gerard butler or someone simular! he is the worst looking bond so far.
why not give other guys a chance? Ronnie Corbett, Lionel Blair, Dale Winton..
This is the clown that Killed the Bond Movies
i havent seen the last Bond movie due to his wooden acting.his acting is so bad i walked out of the first one he done,so i definetly wont be going to see the next or further five.the only contract this Danial Craig should get is for Cuprinol as hes so wooden.
Johnny English is better than him !!
didnt he start out cutting hair on some itv drivvle.
The producers and directors of the bond films must be mad to put Craig in the role of Bond is doesn't come anywere near Connery,More and Brosnan, I for one will not be watching any more Bond films if this is all they can come up with.
Sorry, but DC isn't 'Bond' in my eyes... Sean, followed by Pierce, Roger & Timothy - in that order - were all far better and MUCH closer to Ian Fleming's character... It gets me why film producers decide a book's character is worthy of the big screen and then suddenly decide to change everything about him/her! Okay, some may say he needs to be 'up to date' but the time-line in the novels is, for me, part of the appeal!
the best baddies were in roger films, without roger films there would be no jaws! odd job! scaramanga, grace jones for god sake, major dextor, hugo drax, kamhel khan.....bonds are judged on the baddies too and roger moore bonds are the best end of....!
dont rate him as a Bond, better than Dalton who in my opinion was the worst bond to ever, but nowhere near connery or moore, yes he's got an edgyness to him than connery had, but he's just not the ladies man brosnan moore and connery were
He's too short
For me, roger moore is the best james bond ever! followed by pierce brosnan... James bond is a natural chamer and a gentle man as potrayed in the book.Daniel makes him (BOND) look more like a brute...
'The fans love him...' Not this one. Can't stand the guy in whatever film he's in. The Bond films he's been in weren't that good anyway, so won't be looking out for any more.
last guy was best
i dont trust people with blue eyes, i dont even look at them. hes a good acter but he looks german
OMG WHY?? He's the worst bond ever
Yeah right if they looking to kill of the series. If the next Bond films is as bad as Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace it think its time to call it a day.