New 007 films may be released every 2nd year starting 2012

A place to discuss the latest in Bond News.
Post Reply
User avatar
Blowfeld
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:03 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
For Your Eyes only
The Living Daylights
Location: the world

New 007 films may be released every 2nd year starting 2012

Post by Blowfeld »

I will merge this later with the other spyglass MGM thread. From bloomberg.com, The big news appears to be MGM wants to make a 007 movie every two years and might co-finance Bond 23 which they want it out for 2012. Which seems unlikely to happen at this point, the script is a year to develop and Daniel will be busy for quite awhile.
It seems a little to pie in the sky. Maybe it isn't. I think the schedule they want to establish for 007 will require a recast just to get someone able to keep up with demand grind. I don't see how they would have the time to do any project but 007.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., distributor of the James Bond and Rocky movies, filed for bankruptcy in Manhattan federal court after rejecting a takeover bid by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. and billionaire Carl Icahn.

The Los Angeles-based studio, which foundered after piling on debt to go private, filed a Chapter 11 petition today in U.S. Bankruptcy Court. About 80 percent of its creditors support a so-called pre-packaged plan to extinguish about $4 billion of debt and install managers from Spyglass Entertainment Group Inc., the producers of “The Sixth Sense.” Like Tribune Co. and the former Chrysler LLC, 86-year-old MGM filed for bankruptcy after a leveraged buyout.

“A balance sheet restructuring was the only viable alternative for the company to continue to operate as a going concern,” said Co-Chief Executive Officer Stephen Cooper, who led Enron Corp. through its bankruptcy. “By sharply reducing MGM’s debt load and providing access to new capital, the proposed plan of reorganization achieves these goals.”

MGM plans to spend as much as $125 million on operations in the next 15 weeks. MGM said it’s has already spent $20 million to fund production of films based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s novel, “The Hobbit,” in a co-production deal with Time Warner Inc.’s New Line Cinema, and may need to spend more. Three films based on “The Lord of the Rings,” the sequel to “Hobbit,” grossed about $3 billion at the box office worldwide, MGM said.

Hobbit Obligations

MGM estimated its total obligations to “The Hobbit” are $265 million to $275 million. The company said it is looking for “a third party” to fund those obligations. Its investment stake would be $40 million while the rest would be funded by a lender, MGM said. It’s sharing costs and ownership equally with New Line.

New James Bond films may be released every second year starting in November 2012, MGM said. It aims to own 50 percent of Bond 23, due out that year, with an equal partner paying all of the production costs, it said. Later Bond movies would be wholly owned and funded by MGM, the company said.


Losers in the bankruptcy may include the 2005 buyout group, which retains most of MGM’s existing stock. Tokyo-based Sony Corp. has a 14 percent stake; the Texas-based private equity firm TPG Capital, run by David Bonderman, has 23 percent; Providence Equity Partners Inc. has 34 percent; Comcast Corp. has 21 percent, and Credit Suisse Group AG affiliate DLJ Merchant Banking Partners, has 8 percent, according to a court filing.

Existing equity holders typically get little or nothing in a bankruptcy. The investment group in 2004 said it would put up $1.6 billion in equity financing to buy MGM and take on about $2 billion in debt.

The creditors committee that helped negotiate MGM’s debt restructuring includes Anchorage Capital Group LLC, Davidson Kempner Capital Management, Highland Capital Management, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Invesco Inc. and Solus Alternative Asset Management.

Their debt will be converted into most, or all of the equity in the reorganized company, according to court filings. The studio has assets of $2.7 billion and total liabilities of $5.8 billion; under generally accepted accounting principles, debt is $3.5 billion, MGM said.

MGM said its plan may be confirmed by the court within 30 days. After the bankruptcy, it aims to raise $500 million for operations, including for new movies and television series, it said.

In a competing bid, Lions Gate, based in Vancouver, offered about $1.7 billion in stock and debt to MGM creditors, representing a 55 percent stake in the combined company.

To win more MGM creditors, Icahn, who is Lions Gate’s largest shareholder and owns about 10 percent of MGM’s debt, offered 53 cents on the dollar for senior MGM loans, or about 18 percent more than the 45 cents the debt fetched in the market before Lions Gate’s Oct. 12 bid.

Icahn, who separately mounted a hostile takeover of Lions Gate, was sued by the company on Oct. 29 for allegedly “plotting” a merger of Lions Gate with MGM that would boost the value of his holdings in the two companies. He denied the allegations.

Today, Icahn said in an e-mailed statement he reached an agreement with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. and the lender subcommittee to support MGM in its prepackaged bankruptcy. He will have to right to elect a director to MGM’s board after the bankruptcy, according to his statement.

“I am pleased that we were able to obtain an agreement to make changes to the MGM prepackaged plan that allows me to support it and enables the company to avoid a potentially costly and disruptive bankruptcy process,” he said.

While MGM is in bankruptcy court, any rivals will have to convince a judge as well as creditors that their proposals for MGM are better than the bankrupt company’s own plan.

MGM said it has enough cash on hand to fund “normal business operations” throughout its bankruptcy, including a month’s wages of $1.4 million, officers’ and directors’ compensation of $1.8 million, and as much as $3 million in fees to lawyers and advisers.

After the bankruptcy, MGM’s top managers will be Gary Barber and Roger Birnbaum, who run Spyglass and produced the supernatural thriller “The Sixth Sense,” the company has said.

MGM’s 4,000-title film and television library included “The Wizard of Oz” and “Gone With the Wind.”

The studio was hobbled with debt in the 2005 buyout. Revenue fell as new technology cut into DVD sales, the most profitable part of Hollywood studios’ business, according to Adams Media Research.

Industry DVD sales dropped about 10 percent to $13 billion in 2009, according to the research firm in Monterey, California. In May 2009, MGM hired investment bank Moelis & Co. to help restructure its debt.

MGM Chairman Harry Sloan stepped down as chief executive officer in August 2009, as MGM created an office of the CEO with film head Mary Parent, Chief Financial Officer Bedi Singh and Stephen Cooper, a turnaround specialist. Sloan remained as chairman.

After inviting takeover bids, MGM said it never got an offer high enough at an auction where bidders included Time Warner, which bid about $1.5 billion, and News Corp., according to people familiar with the matter.

Along with Sony and TPG, MGM’s buyout group included Quadrangle Group LLC, according to the studio’s website.

The New York private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management LP has an investment in Los Angeles-based Spyglass.

MGM’s largest unsecured creditors are NBC Universal Inc., with $34.6 million owed; Showtime Networks Inc., with a $25.5 million claim, and Rainbow Media Holdings, with $22.9 million, according to a court filing. MGM said today it expects to pay all valid general unsecured claims.

MGM was controlled by billionaire Kirk Kerkorian at the time of the 2005 buyout, which was his third sale of the studio. He first sold it to Ted Turner in 1986 and then bought it back, leaving the pre-1948 library with Turner, who used it to create movie-oriented cable networks that included Turner Classic Movies, now owned by Time Warner.

Kerkorian later sold the part of MGM he retained to Italian financier Giancarlo Parretti, who lost it to the French bank Credit Lyonnais SA after defaulting on loans used to buy the studio.

With studio executive Frank Mancuso, Kerkorian bought MGM a third time in 1996 for $1.3 billion in cash.

MGM’s filings were made by New York-based Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, hired under a retainer to help the company with its bankruptcy.

The case is In re Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. 10- 15774, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Linda Sandler in New York at lsandler@bloomberg.net; Tiffany Kary in New York at tkary@bloomberg.net.
This story can be found at New James Bond films may be released every second year starting in November 2012
Image
"Those were the days when we still associated Bond with suave, old school actors such as Sean Connery and Roger Moore,"
"Daniel didn't have a hint of suave about him," - Patsy Palmer
User avatar
carl stromberg
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 4505
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:15 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: The Spy Who Loved Me
Favorite Movies: Amicus compendium horror films
It's a Gift
A Night At The Opera
The Return of the Pink Panther
Sons of the Desert
Location: The Duck Inn

Re: New 007 films may be released every 2nd year starting 2012

Post by carl stromberg »

It will be really depressing if Craig appears as Bond again.
Bring back Bond!
User avatar
Omega
0010
Posts: 7579
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:01 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: TLD LTK GE TND TWINE DAD OHMSS
Favorite Movies: Gladiator
John Wick
Pacific Rim
LOTR trilogy
RED
Kingsman
X-Men First Class
X-Men Days of Futures Past
MI Rogue Nation
Location: the lost city
Contact:

Re: New 007 films may be released every 2nd year starting 2012

Post by Omega »

Wasn't 2012 the goal before production was suspended? Good luck with that. November 2012 is all ready full of big names and December 2012 has the Hobbit.
............ :007:
User avatar
FormerBondFan
008
Posts: 6325
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:24 am
Favorite Bond Movie: The Dark Knight Trilogy, Mission: Impossible, Kingsman: The Secret Service and The November Man or any upcoming actioners starring Pierce Brosnan (no, it's not James Bond which is good since it will help him expand his reputation as an actor especially in the action realm)
Favorite Movies: Star Wars
Indiana Jones
Star Trek
The Dark Knight Trilogy
Harry Potter
Middle-Earth
The Matrix
Mission: Impossible
The Mummy
Jurassic Park
Godzilla
Location: Southern CA

Re: New 007 films may be released every 2nd year starting 2012

Post by FormerBondFan »

carl stromberg wrote:It will be really depressing if Craig appears as Bond again.
It would be even worse if Bond 23 released 2 years from now with on it.
Image
katied

Re: New 007 films may be released every 2nd year starting 2012

Post by katied »

It would be really despressing if Craig appears as Bond again
Amen to that. It would be seriously rushing it to get Bond 23 out in a year. Fanboys can hope for it to be out that quickly,but IMO it's a pipe dream.

Wasn't 2012 the goal before production was suspended?Good luck with that. November 2012 is already full of big names and December 2012 has the Hobbit
That would be suicide. Not that Bond 23 is going to be out that soon, of course. But I seriously doubt Babs really cares at this point. :cuss:
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: New 007 films may be released every 2nd year starting 2012

Post by Mazer Rackham »

Still nothing happening yet. MGM can say they are holding auditions tomorrow for the new Bond but it doesn't mean anything without their partners consent. MGM would like to make a new Bonds with as little turn around time as possible, who wouldn't? All this is really for is to remind the people with the money that they can have a $500m movie out every so many years. Anyone serious knows that isn't going to happen, not with the leadership in chrage of Bond now. Babs and co a out of ideas and out of gas. Just one new movie would tax their system to the breaking point.

Although it does confirm what many of us suspected, MGM will not have the money to throw at a new Bond movie for a numbers of year. Bringing in a partner is a possibility, they might be able to exchange the distribution rights as a reward for their participation. Sony certainly made out like bandit doing that, more so then co producing the movies with EON. However potential partners will look a the books and be alarmed the last few Bond have finished in the red on the studio's side of things. Video distribution profits used to be a good carrot to encourage investors despite initial poor returns. DAD made MGM more money in the end than any Bond film they were involved with, not saying much since the biggest in Bond history were not partnered with them.

What will come down the pipe and there is almost unanimous agreement on this point, costs must be drastically be reduced for Bond to continue. In a way it is the killing of the "Golden Goose" Babs and Mikey were so desperately afraid of. They have packed the production cost with so much, well as they would say on Capital Hill -"Pork" it would be unpalatable to economically sensitive auditors. Those kind of shenanigans they can get away with in the good years where money continues to roll in no matter what but as MGM found out planning a future based on those kind of projections is disastrous.
All this might help pave the way for new Bond based on investors concern. A new actor with a substantially smaller paycheck and fewer demands would do wonders to curb cost. Remember how they played that card against Brozza, leaking that he wanted $40m or whatever to make his fifth movie. Utter Tosh. Bond makes enough on the BO side that an actor should be paid well however when time comes to pick between their benefits package and their actors I think we all know which way the ax will fall.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
User avatar
Blowfeld
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:03 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
For Your Eyes only
The Living Daylights
Location: the world

James Bond back in 2012? Not quite...

Post by Blowfeld »

The news updates are making a big deal over the MI6 "interview" via Bloomberg :? :?: :? :?: Here is another perspective.
James Bond back in 2012? Not quite...
by Benjamin Svetkey

Will the MGM merger save 007? Not so fast, Mr. Bond. Just because MGM’s creditors approved a merger with Spyglass Entertainment last week — and The Hobbit got a green light a few weeks before that — doesn’t mean 007 is racing back to screens in 2012, as some reports have suggested. In April, London-based EON Productions announced it was “indefinitely” suspending production on the next James Bond film because of “continuing uncertainty” surrounding MGM. Now there’s a bit more certainty — as Bloomberg reported, MGM has been talking to possible co-financiers — but other issues make an immediate start date impossible, like the fact that Daniel Craig is in Sweden shooting The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo and is signed for two more Dragon films. Sam Mendes might still be available to direct, although he may be busy producing four Shakespeare films for the BBC.

And then there’s the question of who will distribute the next 007 movie. Sony handled the last two, but the merger puts the rights back in play. All of which means James Bond probably won’t return until at least 2014.
This story can be found at James Bond back in 2012? Not quite...
Image
"Those were the days when we still associated Bond with suave, old school actors such as Sean Connery and Roger Moore,"
"Daniel didn't have a hint of suave about him," - Patsy Palmer
Post Reply