QOS copies famous Bond moment - BIG SPOILER

[Captain Nash]

Is suffering from the dreaded(in your mind ) BJ complex such a bad thing?I think not.

What? Ripping something to shreds with no real basis for an argument, pre-judging before seeing, hating something regardless of anything....

I would say yes.

Buy that man a drink.

[carl stromberg]

I think we have discussed the "would you have liked Casino Royale without Craig" question before on some of the earlier threads (if you have got too much time on your hands and want to have a browse) and in the "main reason you don't like Craig" poll/thread.

I would have enjoyed Casino Royale without Daniel Craig, but it would not have been my favourite Bond film. I don't think it was the masterpiece that everyone else thinks it is: It's a good spy film, but a rotten Bond related film. I can't think of it as belonging to the same series as FRWL, TSWLM or Dalton's efforts, for example.

[katied]

I would have enjoyed Casino Royale without Daniel Craig, but it would not have been my favourite Bond film. I don't think it was the masterpiece that everyone else thinks it is: It's a good spy film, but a rotten Bond related film. I can't think of it as belonging to the same series as FRWL, TSWLM or Dalton's efforts, for example.

I would rather watch any of the movies mentioned rather than watch CR again

[stockslivevan]

I would rather watch any of the movies mentioned rather than watch CR again

And it used to be your favorite Bond film, and when you started hating the film out of nowhere (to spite MI6 no doubt) it was RetroKitty that had to remind you that you still had it listed on your profile as your favorite Bond flick before you took it off. So not only do you now dislike Craig, but you dislike the film as well? Yeah. Flip. Flop.

[katied]

I would rather watch any of the movies mentioned rather than watch CR again

And it used to be your favorite Bond film, and when you started hating the film out of nowhere (to spite MI6 no doubt) it was RetroKitty that had to remind you that you still had it listed on your profile as your favorite Bond flick before you took it off. So not only do you now dislike Craig, but you dislike the film as well? Yeah. Flip. Flop.

Irrelevant

Spite?Umm yeah.Not really.

Did I change my mind about CR, and about Daniel Craig?Yes. It's a free country.

[stockslivevan]

Did I change my mind about CR, and about Daniel Craig?Yes. It's a free country.

So what is it that you dislike about Casino Royale other than Craig?

[katied]

It hasn't held up well.Flawed doesn'teven begin to cover it.

[stockslivevan]

It hasn't held up well.Flawed doesn'teven begin to cover it.

And what are the so called flaws?

[katied]

It looks dated already.Made in 2006 and it looks dated.That's not a good thing.Oh and Craig's obviously wooden acting

[stockslivevan]

It looks dated already.Made in 2006 and it looks dated.That's not a good thing.Oh and Craig's obviously wooden acting

Okay, how does it look dated? And I don't understand the criticism on Craig's "obviously wooden acting", why would you say that now when months ago you thought he was great? It's not like the film has changed since 2006. This isn't because I like Craig, I just find this criticism odd given what you said earlier. For example it would make sense if you said that you no longer liked the way he played Bond as opposed to acting skills.

[katied]

LOL Daniel Caig is so wooden his nickname should be Pinocchio

[stockslivevan]

So much for an intelligent discussion.

[katied]

So much for being able to take a joke

[oscartheman]

It looks dated already.Made in 2006 and it looks dated.That's not a good thing.Oh and Craig's obviously wooden acting

Okay, how does it look dated? And I don't understand the criticism on Craig's "obviously wooden acting", why would you say that now when months ago you thought he was great? It's not like the film has changed since 2006. This isn't because I like Craig, I just find this criticism odd given what you said earlier. For example it would make sense if you said that you no longer liked the way he played Bond as opposed to acting skills.

I find it to be dated by the tone and attitude. Almost fresh for 2005 reused leftover 24 and bourne plots now old school by late 2008.


Product placements for shitty 2005 electronics don't help.

[stockslivevan]

So much for being able to take a joke

We were in the middle of a discussion and you thought it was appropriate to throw in a joke instead? No wonder you fail at humor.

[katied]

I find it to be dated by the tone and attitude. Almost fresh for 2005 reused leftover 24 and bourne plots now old school by late 2008.
Product placements for shitty 2005 electronics don't help.

Yup.

[The Sweeney]

So much for being able to take a joke

We were in the middle of a discussion and you thought it was appropriate to throw in a joke instead? No wonder you fail at humor.

Forget it Stocks. She has already proved that when the debate reaches a certain level of depth, and requires a tiny amount of intelligence to continue the debate, she either runs out of the thread completely, only to reappear several posts later and cleverly forget the question/post prompted at her earlier, or she dismisses it with an attempt at bog-standard humour to cover her tracks.

How can you have a serious debate with someone who worshipped Craig and CR only a few months ago, to completely change her opinion to get back at another forum. That shows you the level of intelligence you are dealing with here.

Thankfully, most other members on here are not like her, and are intelligent enough to have a debate with.

[stockslivevan]

So much for being able to take a joke

We were in the middle of a discussion and you thought it was appropriate to throw in a joke instead? No wonder you fail at humor.

Forget it Stocks. She has already proved that when the debate reaches a certain level of depth, and requires a tiny amount of intelligence to continue the debate, she either runs out of the thread completely, only to reappear several posts later and cleverly forget the question/post prompted at her earlier, or she dismisses it with an attempt at bog-standard humour to cover her tracks.

How can you have a serious debate with someone who worshipped Craig and CR only a few months ago, to completely change her opinion to get back at another forum. That shows you the level of intelligence you are dealing with here.

Thankfully, most other members on here are not like her, and are intelligent enough to have a debate with.

I long the days when there was more activity going on and the old chaps were still around discussing Bond in an intellgent manner instead of posting hundreds of rolling eyes and "LOLZ UR SO RITE" replies everytime someone slams Craig.

[carl stromberg]

I thought Craig was wooden too in Casino Royale. It was probably a result of his depiction of a "tough Bond". Or a lack of more than two facial expressions.

[katied]

I thought Craig was wooden too in Casino Royale. It was probably a result of his depiction of a "tough Bond". Or a lack of more than two facial expressions.

See.It's not just me who thinks he's wooden