Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

A place to discuss the latest in Bond News.
Post Reply
User avatar
Blowfeld
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:03 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
For Your Eyes only
The Living Daylights
Location: the world

Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by Blowfeld »

Sound like a wonderful way to spend the 5Oth. 50th anniversary is pewter right?
“We’re not that many…We’re really not that big on locations this year.” -Naomie Harris
[video][/video]
Lends creditability to the budget cut rumour.
Also Daniel gets out of Scotland on Budget airline
Image
"Those were the days when we still associated Bond with suave, old school actors such as Sean Connery and Roger Moore,"
"Daniel didn't have a hint of suave about him," - Patsy Palmer
katied

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by katied »

They're cutting corners. :down:
oscartheman
Agent
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: America

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by oscartheman »

Not big on locations this year :roll: is it just me doesn't she sound like she thinks she will be back?
katied

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by katied »

I wouldn't be surprised if her character gets killed off in Spyfail. :x
oscartheman
Agent
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: America

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by oscartheman »

katied wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if her character gets killed off in Spyfail. :x
Maybe.I still wanna know is she is MP or not.
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12601
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by Kristatos »

oscartheman wrote:
katied wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if her character gets killed off in Spyfail. :x
Maybe.I still wanna know is she is MP or not.
Whilst we won't know for sure until the film comes out, I'd say it's about 90% certain that she isn't. The "Eve becomes Moneypenny" thing is just internet speculation as far as I can tell, nothing in any official statement seems to support it and Harris herself has denied it. She could be lying in order to disguise a plot twist, but I'd say the weight of evidence is such that, at the moment, the burden of proof falls on those who argue that she is Moneypenny.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
katied

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by katied »

I can see them drumming up interest in Spyfail by teasing a big plot twist actually.
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3388
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by The Sweeney »

Am I the only person who sees this budget cut as a positive thing?
If EON cannot rely on OTT locations and crappy CGI, they are going to have to think more creatively, in terms of story, etc. to keep the viewer interested.

I actually think is far better news than EON boldly stating `we are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at this one....more money than sense', etc.

They have a track record of messing things up when money is no object - DAD and QoS.
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12601
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by Kristatos »

The Sweeney wrote:Am I the only person who sees this budget cut as a positive thing?
If EON cannot rely on OTT locations and crappy CGI, they are going to have to think more creatively, in terms of story, etc. to keep the viewer interested.
It rather depends on your level of trust in EON. I think most of us wonder whether they're even capable of thinking creatively, and fear that the result will just be a bargain-basement Bond.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
katied

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by katied »

I kind of see where Sweeney's coming from on this..On the other hand...they are substituting a British beach for someplace else?chintzing just a little, methinks.
User avatar
Blowfeld
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:03 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
For Your Eyes only
The Living Daylights
Location: the world

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by Blowfeld »

The Sweeney wrote:Am I the only person who sees this budget cut as a positive thing?
If EON cannot rely on OTT locations and crappy CGI, they are going to have to think more creatively, in terms of story, etc. to keep the viewer interested.

I actually think is far better news than EON boldly stating `we are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at this one....more money than sense', etc.

They have a track record of messing things up when money is no object - DAD and QoS.
You know I would be the first to cheer a reasonable downsized budget, if this is what is happening here. EoN has talked out of Both sides of their mouth on this MGW said the budget is the same for SF as QOS, for 3 to 4 months everyone else has said locations are being gutted because the money is not there. :shock: It is different when a £3 million GBP production like the The Sweeny turns to the yobbos at Top Gear for the road stunt, 007 is a billion dollar franchise and EON is a major Hollywood production co. looking like amateurs who are despertly cutting back at the very last moment which alone is concerning.

Using second units to captures the exotic location and green screening them in as some reports have it, is not a bad thing, DAD, CR and & QOS had too much money thrown at them. CR even thou majorly scaled back combined with a ton of favours and cheap locations utilized still cost more than DAD. The money is going somewhere but it has not been 'on the scree' for a long time, if these cutback are real and the director is smartly using what limited budget he has then even if the movie fails on whatever front (critical, BO, story, fan reaction, Daniel turning to dust ;) ) it may revitalize the 007 franchise with smart movie making skills.
The one point I keep coming back to is MGW saying SF has a GF feel to it bothers me a lot because we have seen no reason for his belief in evidence anywhere else. Also it bothers me MGW thinks Bond is an anti-hero what does that say about the movie they are making when 'Cubby' and Ian were going in the completely opposite direction 50 years ago.
katied wrote:I kind of see where Sweeney's coming from on this..On the other hand...they are substituting a British beach for someplace else?chintzing just a little, methinks.
It can work so far when they (EON) turn to CGI and other editing gimmicks in the (recent) past it has always come out halfarsed. CR was nitpicked quicker than QOS and DAD for the errors in editing and mistakes on screen.
Kristatos wrote:
The Sweeney wrote:Am I the only person who sees this budget cut as a positive thing?
If EON cannot rely on OTT locations and crappy CGI, they are going to have to think more creatively, in terms of story, etc. to keep the viewer interested.
It rather depends on your level of trust in EON. I think most of us wonder whether they're even capable of thinking creatively, and fear that the result will just be a bargain-basement Bond.
Most of us lost our faith in the franchise in 2005, those here who believed EON's promises Bond was not changing lost what little trust was left November 2006.
Image
"Those were the days when we still associated Bond with suave, old school actors such as Sean Connery and Roger Moore,"
"Daniel didn't have a hint of suave about him," - Patsy Palmer
katied

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by katied »

If they keep using the CGI and the other stuff, they will lose the punters for sure. Diehard Bond fans will be able to look the other way at it(yet again.)
User avatar
Omega
0010
Posts: 7325
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:01 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: TLD LTK GE TND TWINE DAD OHMSS
Favorite Movies: Gladiator
John Wick
Pacific Rim
LOTR trilogy
RED
Kingsman
X-Men First Class
X-Men Days of Futures Past
MI Rogue Nation
Location: the lost city
Contact:

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by Omega »

Good movies do not have to cost $200 million the Bourne movies are better made than Bond for half the cost so it can be done. Can it be done by Eon is the real question.
............ :007:
User avatar
Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 2971
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:06 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Moonraker
Goldfinger
The Spy Who Loved Me
Favorite Movies: Raiders of the Lost Ark, Crazy For Christmas, The Empire Strikes Back, League of Gentlemen (1960's British film), Big Trouble in Little China, Police Academy 2, Carry On At Your Convenience, Commando, Halloween III: Season of the Witch,
Location: Terra

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry »

Seems strange that Eon had success with the cheapo thriller CR (although they spent $600 million promoting Craig's mug) and then spent a fortune on QOS.
Image
User avatar
JackWade CIA
Lieutenant
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:02 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Live and Let Die GoldenEye Casino Royale
Favorite Movies: The Mask of Zorro Thunderheart Battle of Britain
Location: With Muffy in St Petersburg

Re: Skyfall isn’t `that big on locations’

Post by JackWade CIA »

Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry wrote:Seems strange that Eon had success with the cheapo thriller CR (although they spent $600 million promoting Craig's mug) and then spent a fortune on QOS.
Casino R budget fell far on the cheap side. The Casino in Montenegro was too cheaply done.
“Your that secret agent! That English secret agent from England!"
Post Reply