Page 39 of 48
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:35 pm
by FormerBondFan
tbp82 wrote:Omega wrote:tbp82 wrote:Hate that this thread is so quiet jut because Craig is back for at least one more Bond. I hope this thread continues because there are potential Bonds out there.
Craig already had the job so I'm not surprised he's back, i think eon misjudged public expectations big time. It was the right time for a new bond and they recycle Craig who was tired of the role 11 years ago.
Eon ought to be looking for the next bond now to roll out the next movie on time hell they could film both at the same time Craig's final and the new reboot so I'm fine with keeping talking about who the new bond could be
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That's my hope to that they roll out the new Bond quickly after Craig.
The Bond franchise is finished. If you want a new Bond, Kingsman 2 is out next month.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:54 pm
by Omega
I'm looking forward to kingsman but id like bond to get back to normal
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:37 pm
by tbp82
Omega wrote:I'm looking forward to kingsman but id like bond to get back to normal
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I think Kingsman is in the mold of a Bond movie aka classic spy film but I can't see the character of Eggy filling James Bond shoes. There's some simlarities in cloths etc...but if you make Eggy the smooth suave british spy then I think it would turn Kingsman fans off. Eggy is a far removed from classic Bond as some here suggest Craig's portrayal is. With that being said Im still looking forward to the next Bond after Craig in my opinion the search got more interesting as Aidan Turner could be finished with Poldark and Cavill with Superman not to mention the Rupert Friends, Dan Stevens, Jack Huston, Tom Cullen, Tom Hiddleston and this time frame could put a younger guy like Aaron-Taylor Johnson in the frame.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:45 pm
by FormerBondFan
Omega wrote:I'm looking forward to kingsman but id like bond to get back to normal
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That ship has sailed, considering DC will do his 5th.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:57 am
by Veronica
Craig will bless us with another charisma-free sleepwalking potrayal and then Mr.Turner(or the lord of hell

) should continue the show.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:22 pm
by FormerBondFan
Veronica wrote:Craig will bless us with another charisma-free sleepwalking potrayal and then Mr.Turner(or the lord of hell

) should continue the show.
Forget Turner. Let those freaks & weirdos or other non traditional types take over if DC's going to do more Bonds than Pierce.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:37 pm
by Veronica
FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:Craig will bless us with another charisma-free sleepwalking potrayal and then Mr.Turner(or the lord of hell

) should continue the show.
Forget Turner. Let those freaks & weirdos or other non traditional types take over if DC's going to do more Bonds than Pierce.
Look, I also think it's an insult Craig will ultimately do more Bonds(if he doesn't back off,oh how I wish) than Brosnan but I still hope for another great Bond.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:46 pm
by FormerBondFan
Veronica wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:Craig will bless us with another charisma-free sleepwalking potrayal and then Mr.Turner(or the lord of hell

) should continue the show.
Forget Turner. Let those freaks & weirdos or other non traditional types take over if DC's going to do more Bonds than Pierce.
Look, I also think it's an insult Craig will ultimately do more Bonds(if he doesn't back off,oh how I wish) than Brosnan but I still hope for another great Bond.
Forget James Bond. The franchise is beyond saving and is NOT for us anymore. We got Kingsman and Mission: Impossible.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 10:57 pm
by tbp82
FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:Craig will bless us with another charisma-free sleepwalking potrayal and then Mr.Turner(or the lord of hell

) should continue the show.
Forget Turner. Let those freaks & weirdos or other non traditional types take over if DC's going to do more Bonds than Pierce.
Look, I also think it's an insult Craig will ultimately do more Bonds(if he doesn't back off,oh how I wish) than Brosnan but I still hope for another great Bond.
Forget James Bond. The franchise is beyond saving and is NOT for us anymore. We got Kingsman and Mission: Impossible.
Thats cool if thats what you like but Kingsman and MI cant fill the Bond void for me.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 7:00 am
by FormerBondFan
tbp82 wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:Craig will bless us with another charisma-free sleepwalking potrayal and then Mr.Turner(or the lord of hell

) should continue the show.
Forget Turner. Let those freaks & weirdos or other non traditional types take over if DC's going to do more Bonds than Pierce.
Look, I also think it's an insult Craig will ultimately do more Bonds(if he doesn't back off,oh how I wish) than Brosnan but I still hope for another great Bond.
Forget James Bond. The franchise is beyond saving and is NOT for us anymore. We got Kingsman and Mission: Impossible.
Thats cool if thats what you like but Kingsman and MI cant fill the Bond void for me.
Then you might as well destroy DC Bonds once he retires.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:00 am
by Veronica
tbp82 wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:Craig will bless us with another charisma-free sleepwalking potrayal and then Mr.Turner(or the lord of hell

) should continue the show.
Forget Turner. Let those freaks & weirdos or other non traditional types take over if DC's going to do more Bonds than Pierce.
Look, I also think it's an insult Craig will ultimately do more Bonds(if he doesn't back off,oh how I wish) than Brosnan but I still hope for another great Bond.
Forget James Bond. The franchise is beyond saving and is NOT for us anymore. We got Kingsman and Mission: Impossible.
Thats cool if thats what you like but Kingsman and MI cant fill the Bond void for me.
Exactly. I love Kingsman and MI(not all of the movies but oh well) as well but there is only one Bond franchise,always has been. That's why it's so sad they turned such a franchise into just another one with a generic,depressing hero.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:02 am
by FormerBondFan
Veronica wrote:Exactly. I love Kingsman and MI(not all of the movies but oh well) as well but there is only one Bond franchise,always has been. That's why it's so sad they turned such a franchise into just another one with a generic,depressing hero.
Unless that b1tch is out of the picture, James Bond is dead PERMANENTLY!!!!!!
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:33 pm
by tbp82
FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:Exactly. I love Kingsman and MI(not all of the movies but oh well) as well but there is only one Bond franchise,always has been. That's why it's so sad they turned such a franchise into just another one with a generic,depressing hero.
Unless that b1tch is out of the picture, James Bond is dead PERMANENTLY!!!!!!
He's gonna be outta the picture eventually buy Eggy is no more Bond than Craig.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 2:34 am
by FormerBondFan
tbp82 wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Veronica wrote:Exactly. I love Kingsman and MI(not all of the movies but oh well) as well but there is only one Bond franchise,always has been. That's why it's so sad they turned such a franchise into just another one with a generic,depressing hero.
Unless that b1tch is out of the picture, James Bond is dead PERMANENTLY!!!!!!
He's gonna be outta the picture eventually buy Eggy is no more Bond than Craig.
I'm referring to Babs. She needs to go, not just DC.
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 3:08 am
by Omega
Veronica wrote:
Exactly. I love Kingsman and MI(not all of the movies but oh well) as well but there is only one Bond franchise,always has been. That's why it's so sad they turned such a franchise into just another one with a generic,depressing hero.
I agree. Bond was something special, CR turned bond into average action spy movies.
I'm insulted they say Craig agreed because he wanted Moore's record, the better man who worked harder made more movies and was a better representative for the franchise.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:06 am
by FormerBondFan
Omega wrote:I'm insulted they say Craig agreed because he wanted Moore's record, the better man who worked harder made more movies and was a better representative for the franchise.
Seriously, the 7th Bond actor may as well be a Dalek based on this madness.
[video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxD-5z_xHBU[/video]
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:04 pm
by tbp82
FormerBondFan wrote:Omega wrote:I'm insulted they say Craig agreed because he wanted Moore's record, the better man who worked harder made more movies and was a better representative for the franchise.
Seriously, the 7th Bond actor may as well be a Dalek based on this madness.
[video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxD-5z_xHBU[/video]
You seem to have the most gloom and doom outta everyone posting in this thread. I was wondering who are some people out there right now who'd you'd see a a suitable Bond after Craig?
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:15 pm
by Kristatos
tbp82 wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Omega wrote:I'm insulted they say Craig agreed because he wanted Moore's record, the better man who worked harder made more movies and was a better representative for the franchise.
Seriously, the 7th Bond actor may as well be a Dalek based on this madness.
[video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxD-5z_xHBU[/video]
You seem to have the most gloom and doom outta everyone posting in this thread. I was wondering who are some people out there right now who'd you'd see a a suitable Bond after Craig?
Ooh, ooh, I know this one. Anyone can be Bond now, we can't have any more good Bond films in the future because it would be an insult to Pierce, repeat ad nauseum.
BOND #7
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:24 pm
by Omega
tbp82 wrote:
You seem to have the most gloom and doom outta everyone posting in this thread. I was wondering who are some people out there right now who'd you'd see a a suitable Bond after Craig?
Don't bother. FBF is a strict fundamentalist when it come to Bond and the insult to Brosnan.
What is interesting is if true the Apple and Amazon interest in distributing and partnership in bond. This could be a big game changer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Re: BOND #7
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:30 pm
by dirtybenny
tbp82 wrote:FormerBondFan wrote:Omega wrote:I'm insulted they say Craig agreed because he wanted Moore's record, the better man who worked harder made more movies and was a better representative for the franchise.
Seriously, the 7th Bond actor may as well be a Dalek based on this madness.
[video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxD-5z_xHBU[/video]
You seem to have the most gloom and doom outta everyone posting in this thread. I was wondering who are some people out there right now who'd you'd see a a suitable Bond after Craig?
As the others have alluded to, talking to FBF is similar to having a conversation with one of those toys you had as a kid, where you'd pull the string and one of 4 prerecorded phrases would play, over and over and over again. Which is a shame, as on the rare occasion he goes off script he can actually say something meaningful.