Kristatos wrote:Wasn't me.
Anyway, I've just found out what Milly Alcock said: “Simply existing as a woman in that space is something that people comment on. We have become very comfortable having this weird ownership of women’s bodies.” *That's* controversial? Talk about making her point for her.
Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk
A little out of context or maybe what i saw is out of context.
What I saw was she was trying to complain about fans who were not happy with her drunk supergirl. Maybe somebody else connected the dots but following up with “Dad of four, Christian,” and “if you’re pissing the right kind of people off, you’re doing OK.”
Change that to :Father of four, Muslim. Father of four, Jew. Father of four, Hindu.
Would that fly?
Honestly, she’s not the best example, you got actors doing a lot, worse damage to their series and their career.
My only point with Milly is that she didn’t have to have this, just stay the course let the movie come out. Let the studio defend you. If there’s a problem. That’s what they’re paying to do.
there’s a lot of people that are curious to see the big screen Supergirl movie, I think she’s gonna be OK regardless.
Especially in the comic book/ sci-fi genre it seems to be there’s a trend of female stars lashing back at the fans they think are all fan boys, but my experience that’s not true either.
I think they have the mistake idea what it is to be a feminist.
And last point that takes her side for the initial comment, the movie industry, and the pornography aren’t that different. They’re targeting peoples looks and body types to sell and is not female or male that are singled out. The whole industry is looking to sell an attractiveness.
I do feel the complaints about her weak sauce. And I feel her complaints at this point are weak sauce.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
