





What is going on here?bjmdds wrote:TLJ is just under $400 million in the USA through today.
I had to think for a minute to know what you were talking about. The closest thing I can think of to a political message was the revelation that the rebellion gets its arms from the same people who supply the First Order. I suspect that the idea of arms dealers supplying both sides won't be news to most people.John P. Drake wrote:I haven't seen it yet, but I heard there's a lot of one-sided politics with overt liberal values in it slamming conservatives, hence my reason not to see it is farther established.
Look at the bright side. Rian Johnson, writer and director of VIII, will not return for the next one.Omega wrote:First time I left not caring about the next installment.
I saw it this morning and didn't like it. Just found it bland. But I can see how this film has loony left-wing politics. It's got this business of gender politics. I'm all for having good characterizations, including the female characters. But here they deal with the female characters through gender politics. The women are either in positions of power or strong and resourceful, but the men are wimps. Vanity Fair (another left-leaning rag) had an article recently applauding the gender politics. The article is titled "Star Wars: The Last Jedi Offers the Harsh Condemnation of Mansplaining We Need in 2017." The Luke Skywalker in this film is a whiny teary-eyed old man, like he's no longer got strength of leadership. Then there's the subplot (and I'll keep this vague to avoid spoilers) about endangered horse-like creatures and some class warfare shtick (it has something to do with a casino for the ultra-rich). In other words, you've got the claptrap about environmentalism and income inequality. Even before the film's release, Mark Hamill went into his political rants, trashing Trump in a tweet or something, then he got into a tweet war with Ted Cruz, who spanked him big time, obviously hurting the Jedi's ego. Bottom line: his rants obviously alienated a segment of the fandom who don't share his views. What an idiot. I remember seeing the first one back in 1977. Pure escapism. There was none of this political noise.John P. Drake wrote:I haven't seen it yet, but I heard there's a lot of one-sided politics with overt liberal values in it slamming conservatives, hence my reason not to see it is farther established.
I can’t think of anything that was overt. The gambling planet and arms dealers would be the closest it comes.Kristatos wrote:I had to think for a minute to know what you were talking about. The closest thing I can think of to a political message was the revelation that the rebellion gets its arms from the same people who supply the First Order. I suspect that the idea of arms dealers supplying both sides won't be news to most people.John P. Drake wrote:I haven't seen it yet, but I heard there's a lot of one-sided politics with overt liberal values in it slamming conservatives, hence my reason not to see it is farther established.
trueFormerBondFan wrote:Look at the bright side. Rian Johnson, writer and director of VIII, will not return for the next one.Omega wrote:First time I left not caring about the next installment.
Hamill is a pathetic, weaselly liberal, who should keep his yap shut tightAtticus wrote:I saw it this morning and didn't like it. Just found it bland. But I can see how this film has loony left-wing politics. It's got this business of gender politics. I'm all for having good characterizations, including the female characters. But here they deal with the female characters through gender politics. The women are either in positions of power or strong and resourceful, but the men are wimps. Vanity Fair (another left-leaning rag) had an article recently applauding the gender politics. The article is titled "Star Wars: The Last Jedi Offers the Harsh Condemnation of Mansplaining We Need in 2017." The Luke Skywalker in this film is a whiny teary-eyed old man, like he's no longer got strength of leadership. Then there's the subplot (and I'll keep this vague to avoid spoilers) about endangered horse-like creatures and some class warfare shtick (it has something to do with a casino for the ultra-rich). In other words, you've got the claptrap about environmentalism and income inequality. Even before the film's release, Mark Hamill went into his political rants, trashing Trump in a tweet or something, then he got into a tweet war with Ted Cruz, who spanked him big time, obviously hurting the Jedi's ego. Bottom line: his rants obviously alienated a segment of the fandom who don't share his views. What an idiot. I remember seeing the first one back in 1977. Pure escapism. There was none of this political noise.John P. Drake wrote:I haven't seen it yet, but I heard there's a lot of one-sided politics with overt liberal values in it slamming conservatives, hence my reason not to see it is farther established.
I don't think the amount of box office gross the film brought could be considered a "tanking". It's only seven million bucks shy of being $900 Million on its worldwide gross. Not getting a dime from me, however. They can take their "liberal valued" product and shove it. That's my major problem with DC's Arrowverse shows, as well. Feminizing and emasculating the male image so it can appeal to the snowflake crowd. No thanks!bjmdds wrote:Hamill is a pathetic, weaselly liberal, who should keep his yap shut tightAtticus wrote:I saw it this morning and didn't like it. Just found it bland. But I can see how this film has loony left-wing politics. It's got this business of gender politics. I'm all for having good characterizations, including the female characters. But here they deal with the female characters through gender politics. The women are either in positions of power or strong and resourceful, but the men are wimps. Vanity Fair (another left-leaning rag) had an article recently applauding the gender politics. The article is titled "Star Wars: The Last Jedi Offers the Harsh Condemnation of Mansplaining We Need in 2017." The Luke Skywalker in this film is a whiny teary-eyed old man, like he's no longer got strength of leadership. Then there's the subplot (and I'll keep this vague to avoid spoilers) about endangered horse-like creatures and some class warfare shtick (it has something to do with a casino for the ultra-rich). In other words, you've got the claptrap about environmentalism and income inequality. Even before the film's release, Mark Hamill went into his political rants, trashing Trump in a tweet or something, then he got into a tweet war with Ted Cruz, who spanked him big time, obviously hurting the Jedi's ego. Bottom line: his rants obviously alienated a segment of the fandom who don't share his views. What an idiot. I remember seeing the first one back in 1977. Pure escapism. There was none of this political noise.John P. Drake wrote:I haven't seen it yet, but I heard there's a lot of one-sided politics with overt liberal values in it slamming conservatives, hence my reason not to see it is farther established.He might be the reason this film tanked at the box office. They feminized Luke?
They want men to relate to Rey?
![]()
This feminization of the American male must stop once and for all
SPOILER causing outrage by fans: click space below to reveal it. :
In a universe far, far away, compared to TFA, you bet your light saber this film is tanking big time. I thought it would top $1 billion in the USA alone. It might struggle to get to $800 million here. That's a big number, but not SW proper numbers, in this environment. My friend just saw it and said it was OK.Kristatos wrote:"Tanked at the box office" LOL