his right hand the knuckles are tattooed "BABS"bjmdds wrote:Finally, a look and a role that suits him perfectly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
his right hand the knuckles are tattooed "BABS"bjmdds wrote:Finally, a look and a role that suits him perfectly.
Omega wrote:his right hand the knuckles are tattooed "BABS"bjmdds wrote:Finally, a look and a role that suits him perfectly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If anything, there's something about the trailers of every Batfilm in TDK Trilogy that made them VERY epic, and this is what every trailer in DCEU are lacking though I can make an exception with MOS.bjmdds wrote:[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvJaSmunY7Y[/video] Oh brotherIt's worse than I thought
Utter useless trash!
FBF, please save your money November 2017
I thought the Nolan Bat trilogy was the BEST of any superhero genre I have seen yetFormerBondFan wrote:If anything, there's something about the trailers of every Batfilm in TDK Trilogy that made them VERY epic, and this is what every trailer in DCEU are lacking though I can make an exception with MOS.bjmdds wrote:[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvJaSmunY7Y[/video] Oh brotherIt's worse than I thought
Utter useless trash!
FBF, please save your money November 2017
looking at the still, he's the worst Batman, it's clear who he is, nobody in Gotham is puzzled who batman is.bjmdds wrote:[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvJaSmunY7Y[/video] Oh brotherIt's worse than I thought
Utter useless trash!
FBF, please save your money November 2017
Nobody since that slash my wrists and only in it for the money comment have thought Craig is coming back. The freaking head of MGM is pissed at Craig for saying it, I thought Sony may of called him out as well.dirtybenny wrote:Found a couple of articles on the all mighty MI6-HQ that confirm what we already know:
Christoph Waltz unhappy with his portrayal of Blofeld
It confirms Waltz felt himself above the role, despite his claims that the days of "Punch and Judy" were behind them, more interestingly it seems he felt the much acclaimed Sammy Boy wasn't providing the necessary direction to really get in to the part.
Also
Daniel Craig pissed off MGM with negative publicity
Nothing new here, but the bit where the apologetic "reporter" states "Craig's much vaunted - and often taken out of context - 'slash my wrists' Time Out interview..." I found to be interesting. It's further proof of the blinders Craig fans wear when they read about their hero, never mind the fact he went on to spell out in no uncertain term and in great detail how if he came back "it would only be for the money" no this was all just a simple misunderstanding, a bit of hyperbole taken out of context, nothing to see here, please disperse. Laughable!
We are in agreement.bjmdds wrote:I thought the Nolan Bat trilogy was the BEST of any superhero genre I have seen yetFormerBondFan wrote:If anything, there's something about the trailers of every Batfilm in TDK Trilogy that made them VERY epic, and this is what every trailer in DCEU are lacking though I can make an exception with MOS.bjmdds wrote:[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvJaSmunY7Y[/video] Oh brotherIt's worse than I thought
Utter useless trash!
FBF, please save your money November 2017
I also thought Bane was the most evil and brutal of ANY movie villain that was ever filmed
Plus he uses his gravely "Batman voice" constantly, even out of costume! Bale's Batman put that voice on while suited up in an attempt to throw people off the trail as it were, where as Affleck uses it to let everyone know he and Batman are one and the same!Omega wrote:looking at the still, he's the worst Batman, it's clear who he is, nobody in Gotham is puzzled who batman is.
Babzy plays ironfisted dictator only because MGM allows it, they own half the rights, so it's not like she can "take her ball and go home" with them, if they really want something they'll have it!Omega wrote:Nobody since that slash my wrists and only in it for the money comment have thought Craig is coming back. The freaking head of MGM is pissed at Craig for saying it, I thought Sony may of called him out as well.
Babs may have final say of who is cast but MGM owns more bond rights than she does and she's doesn't put up $400 million to make them.
MGM could "remake" thunderball and casino royal on their own, it could be their own series.
I know everybody talks about what ifs on the CR movie rights, what if cubby had made CR, what if Connery had stared. What if Dalton had made it after LTK ? They ran out of bond stories they had rights to if the had gotten CR back then , I think it could have really been good with Dalton or even pierce as his exit.
But probably wouldn't happen because before 2004 they thought CR was "unfilmable"
My first guess was wrong.FormerBondFan wrote:
Did they remake the Langoliers again?Prayer to Shai-Halud
Bless the Maker and all His Water. Bless the coming and going of Him, May His passing cleanse the world. May He keep the world for his people.
Why does it still bother me this berk was lauded by so many as the perfect 007? The picture says it all. He is unkept & uncouth, Ian Fleming is spinning in his grave.bjmdds wrote:Finally, a look and a role that suits him perfectly.
George Lazenby also publicly quit before OHMSS was released, this along with the fact the audience was not sure anybody but Sean Connery was James Bond I think hurt OHMSS. My personal opinion is OHMSS was such a wide deviation from the previous films it needed a known quantity staring to help it succeed. Ironic how the EON team was phoning it in the last few films with a dejected Sean Connery ready to walk as soon as his contract was fulfilled and they take the time to try to get OHMSS right with a unknown.dirtybenny wrote:Babzy plays ironfisted dictator only because MGM allows it, they own half the rights, so it's not like she can "take her ball and go home" with them, if they really want something they'll have it!Omega wrote:Nobody since that slash my wrists and only in it for the money comment have thought Craig is coming back. The freaking head of MGM is pissed at Craig for saying it, I thought Sony may of called him out as well.
Babs may have final say of who is cast but MGM owns more bond rights than she does and she's doesn't put up $400 million to make them.
MGM could "remake" thunderball and casino royal on their own, it could be their own series.
I know everybody talks about what ifs on the CR movie rights, what if cubby had made CR, what if Connery had stared. What if Dalton had made it after LTK ? They ran out of bond stories they had rights to if the had gotten CR back then , I think it could have really been good with Dalton or even pierce as his exit.
But probably wouldn't happen because before 2004 they thought CR was "unfilmable"
As to CR being "unfilmable" they were right, as a traditional "Bond" film the ending to too dower, remember OHMSS under performed and many blamed the sad ending. I imagine the old guard at EON would not have been too anxious to make the same mistake twice, had they the opportunity. However if you do as Babs did and strip away the "Bondness" and create a generic action film, it works, at least on some level.
John Drake wrote:What's with all the Affleck hate? Can't say he's my favourite actor but he's a much better fit for a playboy millionaire than Craig is for a suave secret agent. Most people thought Affleck was the best thing about B v S.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seZLI-tVahE[/video]