FBF,who cares what Craig fanboys think anyway?
For what I've seen in general Brosnan is no.2 choice for best Bond after Sean. Despite the glorious campaign put on by EON to represent Craig as the best thing that ever happened to the franchise.
She hired Mendes because he is reliably pretentious and can be counted on to deliver a pretentious movie that critics will applaud. She hired another "character" director during Brosnan era. Apted,although he is not as pretentious as Mendes.
But I get the feeling he was interested in working with Brosnan and Marceau but not particulary interested in the movie happening around them. And the fact that they started shooting TND without the finished script and a complete cast shows how much of a knack EON had for film making.
Also,there's a whole lot of talk about next Bond so I think that says something about actual impact Craig has on audience. Back in 2005 there was a huge backlash about his casting and I feel this "the best since Connery" thing is much more of a talk of media and pretentious critics than general public.
GoldenEye game with Craig? I agree it's just
