You realize that you're containing a zombie here, and zombies cannot be returned to their former state. If you bring in Turner, this DC virus will still walk among us. Why? Because Babs managed to corrupted the minds of general public and American awards systems into liking DC's Bonds, those corrupted Bond films are now considered a "classic" Bonds so therefore, DC's Bond will NEVER be separated from the original 5 Bond actors by public. If SF had crashed and burned it released, that would be a different story.bjmdds wrote:Choosing Turner after Cr-egg might show the crumb realizes she went off the rails with her new creation. Broccoli requires 'detente' with FBF going forward.FormerBondFan wrote:I'll NEVER tolerate for what that b1tch did to Pierce. NO, you can't make me BJ. I made my decision. If you support Babs again, you're support DC's Bond without even knowing it.bjmdds wrote:FBF has become unhinged over the news of Turner's EON visit. He should calm down and not fly off the handle like that. I understand his contempt for the evil one that fired Brosnan. Let's hope FBF can turn the page on her egregious mistakes about Pierce and join in on the excitement that Aidan Turner could bring to the franchise going forward, with her possibly diminished in importance with a new distributor.
And if that psychotic dictator hired those Oscar nominated people or potentials for Craig's Bond films but not Pierce's, then it's pointless to give support to Turner. Why don't she just hire those rotten dogs for Bond and give them the same treatment she gave to Craig?
When there is a film or a TV series that popular, it would get referenced or being used a model for future works. For example, look at OHMSS. Lazenby's only Bond is considered a classic and would later be referenced in films like Inception. Also, look at 1978 version of Superman as it was used as model for Batman Begins. I know for that fact that DC's Bonds will later be referenced in future works based on their so-called popularity. If that's the case, you might cast anybody as Bond. If DC's Bonds will be used for inspiration for future classics, why not Bond films starring Bond actors who look less Bondian than DC is?
By making the cinematic Bond looking less and less Bond after DC, that's when DC will be separated from the original 5. Besides, I think it's fair for DC to have fellow successors who look less Bondian to join him in a club where they gets tomatoes thrown in their faces because they're not classic Bonds but corrupted Bonds. Besides, we all rebels here consider the Bond reboot to be pointless. Let me ask you this BJ. Would you really want classic Bond actor be in the reboot timeline, which by the way should for less Bond looking actors?