
Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
Kris, you are pathetic. Cultist and brainwashed crap again? What did I write that is not a fact? Point it out. You are a political hack that believes gas chambers are on their way back.Kristatos wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:28 pm One cannot debate facts with a Trump cultist because, to the brainwashed, truth is whatever Trump says it is. If Trump says that 2+2=5, then that is what you are obliged to believe, even if he said that 2+2=6 yesterday.
Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
Like when Trump had his (first) press secretary Sean Spicer come out to talk about how Trump's inauguration crowd size was bigger than Obama's, when it was pretty clear not the case. For anyone else it wouldn't be much of a big deal, but for him size seems to be about everything.Kristatos wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:28 pm One cannot debate facts with a Trump cultist because, to the brainwashed, truth is whatever Trump says it is. If Trump says that 2+2=5, then that is what you are obliged to believe, even if he said that 2+2=6 yesterday.
Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
Yeah, he's obsessed with ratings, as one might expect from a former reality TV star.Mexican Staring Frog wrote:Like when Trump had his (first) press secretary Sean Spicer come out to talk about how Trump's inauguration crowd size was bigger than Obama's, when it was pretty clear not the case. For anyone else it wouldn't be much of a big deal, but for him size seems to be about everything.Kristatos wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:28 pm One cannot debate facts with a Trump cultist because, to the brainwashed, truth is whatever Trump says it is. If Trump says that 2+2=5, then that is what you are obliged to believe, even if he said that 2+2=6 yesterday.
Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
Google "Brandolini's Law".bjmdds wrote: What did I write that is not a fact? Point it out.
Again, you don't state what FACTS I mentioned are wrong. This is your response? "Brandolini's law, also known as the bulls--t asymmetry principle, is an internet adage which emphasizes the difficulty of debunking bullsh--t.---"The amount of energy needed to refute bulls--t is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."-------a liberal response to facts you do not want to believe exists. Enjoy your tormented existence hating Trump. I am done with you.------- Brandolini on this: HOME ECONOMY US GDP surged a record 33% in the 3rd quarter as the economy reopened, roughly double the next-biggest jumpKristatos wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:17 amGoogle "Brandolini's Law".bjmdds wrote: What did I write that is not a fact? Point it out.
Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
I briefly entertained the notion that Trump might go full Hitler if re-elected, before dismissing it as overblown. Then again....bjmdds wrote:You, the gas chamber lunatic, are rational?
I said we should essentially bring Biden's feet to the fire once elected, but I also think we should do the same for corporate media that aligned with ANY political point of view (FOX, NBC, CBS, etc). Ideally, the media would be adversarial of any politician/leader strictly as a way to keep them in check. Giving Biden a free pass is not what I want from our media. The only way to combat this is seek out and elect politicians who are not beholden to corporate donors but is truly representing the people. It's gonna be a very long fight. I'd just hope to see that shift happen in my lifetime.Kristatos wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:26 pm Glenn Greenwald resigns from The Intercept over censorship of stories critical of Biden: https://greenwald.substack.com/p/my-res ... -intercept
I think he won it because of Hillary, personally. Biden has one advantage over her in that,while he doesn't exactly inspire enthusiasm, he isn't actively loathed the way she is.Mexican Staring Frog wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:56 am Trump is right when he says he won the election because of Obama/Biden. If Biden simply does business as usual from 2009-2017, that may allow another Trump to rise to the challenge. Though I can't imagine any future candiate being as disastrous as Trump...
Honestly I think Biden and Harris are disposable to the Democrat party, IMO the higher ups pulling the strings have no expectations of winning so the put two candidates they will not miss in 2024 on the ballot. Kamala Harris bombed out in the primaries, Biden would have lost if the DNC had not organized a staged revolt against Bernie Sanders. Bernie would be a much tougher fight for trump.Kristatos wrote:I think he won it because of Hillary, personally. Biden has one advantage over her in that,while he doesn't exactly inspire enthusiasm, he isn't actively loathed the way she is.Mexican Staring Frog wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:56 am Trump is right when he says he won the election because of Obama/Biden. If Biden simply does business as usual from 2009-2017, that may allow another Trump to rise to the challenge. Though I can't imagine any future candiate being as disastrous as Trump...
True. The GOP demonized the Clintons for nearly 30 years by this point that her reputation among them is practically mythical.Kristatos wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:51 amI think he won it because of Hillary, personally. Biden has one advantage over her in that,while he doesn't exactly inspire enthusiasm, he isn't actively loathed the way she is.Mexican Staring Frog wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:56 am Trump is right when he says he won the election because of Obama/Biden. If Biden simply does business as usual from 2009-2017, that may allow another Trump to rise to the challenge. Though I can't imagine any future candiate being as disastrous as Trump...