First Bond 22 pics!!

Post by **carl stromberg** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:41 pm

Oh no: the CraigisGod cult is back again........

I'm sorry that many people seem to hate the James Bond series and the idea of a handsome, suave actor playing James Bond; and that the casting of 40 year old Daniel Craig as a "young Bond" revived their interest in the series.

Bond has been ruined. If only I could find a forum with like-minded James Bond fans who can discuss what has gone wrong with the Bond series without Daniel Craig groupies ranting away........

Captain Nash · Post by **Captain Nash** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:46 pm

Yep.
Tough break Carlski.

Where has anyone said they hate the Bond films?
I didn't need Craig to revive my interest in the series. It didn't need reviving.
So how's the Bond 22 boycott coming along?

James1090 · Post by **James1090** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:23 pm

DAD was critcally and financially acclaimed. it was later on that everyone started to hate or dislike him as Bond. It can happen to Daniel Craig as well.

stockslivevan · Post by **stockslivevan** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:45 pm

James1090 wrote:DAD was critcally and financially acclaimed. it was later on that everyone started to hate or dislike him as Bond. It can happen to Daniel Craig as well.

Doubtful, considering CR was more successful than DAD, especially critically. Come on, it had 59% from the start on Rotten Tomatoes while CR got 94%.

Post by **007** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:47 pm

That MI6 forum must be a really fascinating place to be.

Post by **bjmdds** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:50 am

If you are in favor of Craig, that is the place to be.

Post by **bjmdds** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:26 am

stockslivevan wrote:5'11'' is still considered short for you guys? I had no idea the average height went past that. And less than handsome? The ladies would disagree.

Since you brought it up, IMDB listed Craig at 6' when he was named Bond in October 2005. A year later, IMDB listed him at 5'11" tall. Now, IMDB has him listed at 5'10" tall. He seems to be shrinking as he ages.

stockslivevan · Post by **stockslivevan** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:59 am

BJ, you realize you're talking about IMDb right?

That's not the best place to look for accurate info. The fact that you acknowledge Craig being listed on that site as 6' and constantly changing confirms it.

Most sites confirmed that he's 5'11, so I'll assume that's his real height. Besides, if he was one inch higher, no one would be using the "Craig is short" card.

You know it's true.