




What about a female Bond in an unofficial Bond movie?Omega wrote:Yikes! She has better defined arms than Craig, hell any of the Bonds.
Not sure what she is supposed to be, got no ill will towards her she'd be a hall of a henchma...woman.
Problem with Craig is he is such a small build she make him look like Micky Rooney
Yes, sorry EA. My mistake. I believed what someone had written on MI6, that SF had surpassed TB. I think it is likely it will, but it hasn't done just yet.English Agent wrote:I cant believe it...............after all these years there is something i dont agree with what 'The Sweeney' has said![]()
Wait for the Chinese BO for SF before celebrating.............Sweeney!
I think Kristatos is having problems logging in? GoldenEye will have a look.The Sweeney wrote:This forum doesn't work when using Windows 7 on my laptop.
Anyone else experience problems logging in?
http://www.deadline.com/2013/01/movie-p ... snl-kagan/ (yeah its Dealine again, I know I swore not use them but they are the only one with the story)
Warner Bros’ latest visit to Middle Earth should generate $1.26B in revenues from all major sources — 3.59 times its expected costs — putting it on track to become the most profitable movie released in December, SNL Kagan says today. The research company builds a financial model for films by using early box office results to estimate likely revenues from theaters, home video, and free and pay TV deals against probable costs. To account for many variables it can’t ascertain (including distribution fees, interest, profit participation, and residuals), Kagan figures a movie will be profitable if expected revenues are 1.75 times higher than estimated costs. Those with a lower ratio but that are still higher than 1.40 times are in a gray area. Films below that are deemed likely money losers. By that standard three other December films will end up in the black: Universal’s Les Miserables ($396.7M in expected revenues/2.37 times costs), Weinstein Company’s Django Unchained ($473.2M/2.18X) and Columbia Picture’s Zero Dark Thirty ($230.7M/2.10X). Those falling short include: Paramount’s Jack Reacher ($253.8M/1.38X), Universal’s This Is 40 ($159.5M/1.14X), Fox’s Parental Guidance ($163.3M/1.12X), Disney’s Monsters, Inc 3D ($75.0M/0.77X), Paramount’s The Guilt Trip ($89.1M/0.57X), and FilmDistrict’s Playing For Keeps ($37.7M/0.28X).
That made December a pretty good month for studios: The 10 top releases are expected to average revenues that are 1.84 times higher than costs, exceeding 1.67X from 10 films in December 2011, and 1.40X from 12 films in the month in 2010. It’s behind 2009, though, when 13 films had an average profitability ratio of 1.99.
No issues for me with Linux, OSX, Windows 7, WIndows 8, Windows XP, (screw Vista), with Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari.carl stromberg wrote:I think Kristatos is having problems logging in? GoldenEye will have a look.The Sweeney wrote:This forum doesn't work when using Windows 7 on my laptop.
Anyone else experience problems logging in?
If Broccoli keeps Logan as her future screenwriter, what say you to him penning a male-male Bond kissy-kissy scene in a future film, given the horrendous tangent the green vegetable is off on with Bond scripts? Given his sexual orientation, he will most assuredly press the queen B to push his envelope to introduce the minions to a bi-sexual Bond. Would that be your final straw? EA? If that's the case, bring in Chyna to the equation.The Sweeney wrote:This forum doesn't work when using Windows 7 on my laptop.
Anyone else experience problems logging in?
Let's hope he does know his onionsOmega wrote:Hobbit to make $1.28Billion!I wonder if this guy knows his onions as BJ would say.
http://www.deadline.com/2013/01/movie-p ... snl-kagan/ (yeah its Dealine again, I know I swore not use them but they are the only one with the story)
Warner Bros’ latest visit to Middle Earth should generate $1.26B in revenues from all major sources — 3.59 times its expected costs — putting it on track to become the most profitable movie released in December, SNL Kagan says today. The research company builds a financial model for films by using early box office results to estimate likely revenues from theaters, home video, and free and pay TV deals against probable costs. To account for many variables it can’t ascertain (including distribution fees, interest, profit participation, and residuals), Kagan figures a movie will be profitable if expected revenues are 1.75 times higher than estimated costs. Those with a lower ratio but that are still higher than 1.40 times are in a gray area. Films below that are deemed likely money losers. By that standard three other December films will end up in the black: Universal’s Les Miserables ($396.7M in expected revenues/2.37 times costs), Weinstein Company’s Django Unchained ($473.2M/2.18X) and Columbia Picture’s Zero Dark Thirty ($230.7M/2.10X). Those falling short include: Paramount’s Jack Reacher ($253.8M/1.38X), Universal’s This Is 40 ($159.5M/1.14X), Fox’s Parental Guidance ($163.3M/1.12X), Disney’s Monsters, Inc 3D ($75.0M/0.77X), Paramount’s The Guilt Trip ($89.1M/0.57X), and FilmDistrict’s Playing For Keeps ($37.7M/0.28X).
That made December a pretty good month for studios: The 10 top releases are expected to average revenues that are 1.84 times higher than costs, exceeding 1.67X from 10 films in December 2011, and 1.40X from 12 films in the month in 2010. It’s behind 2009, though, when 13 films had an average profitability ratio of 1.99.
EA to sign in, to view the forum/site, both? Kris can't see the forum at all.English Agent wrote:Yes. i too have been having problems logging into this site recently..........only on my work laptop computer, where it is impossible for some reason to access this site! Not sure what version of windows it is , coz its not my computer, but i will check tomorrow!