Kristatos wrote:I think it's always been like that. People go on about Obama's "narcissism" like it's something unique, but honestly, who other than a narcissist would look at the job of POTUS and think "I could do that? "

Probably right. The Senate is full of people who believe they need to be president. John Kerry, Hillary, Obama, McCain, John Edwards, Al Gore, bob Dole, Nixon, Kennedy, LBJ. Those are just the one I can think of off the top of my head, Governors are the next group guy who think our nation can not do without them.
Funny, Bob Dole and McCain were supposed to be too old for the job, so old they'd never live to see the end of their first term, years on both are active and lucid. If Hillary runs or Liz Warren I bet them dems push back on the ageism they spread.
Listing to the rhetoric has made me turn off the tv. So many ads, the political shows full of talking points with no real thoughts in sight. One person for a low level seat is blaming their opponent for dividing the state and supports big business, and of course every dem support Obama's agenda without question
Well. Maybe the senators who voted for obamacare need to be held accountable, but that was a party line vote, a few places got kickbacks, reality was party members were required to support it no matter what. It always gets me how Repubs and Dems balm the media, talk radio, blogs, whatever for opposition to their doctrines, or party members faltering, it's the constituents who raise hell when the find out about whatever is going on that scare the politicians making them hold back. Which is what is supposed to happen.
To my mind politics was supposed to be local, not a national party run strategy.
Sort of on topic
What they hell happened to Landrieu? Calling her constituents & her state in so many words raciest and sexiest. Is this a Davy Crockett "You can go to hell -- I'm going to Texas" moment?
I think it is very unfair to trash her state in a national media spotlight, which in New York I'm sure the media assume this stereotype is right on the money. Louisiana is a odd state, proud of their history political corruption and good ol' boy networks, but also bucks the status quo. Landrieu used her family's name and gold ol' boy status to hold her seat since 1997, (those sexiest SOBs! )
Obama may have lost the state twice (he faired about the same as Gore and Kerry) but the state does swing between Repub and dem, they loved them some Bill Clinton. Of the deep south states Louisianan is more progressive and has been with a more diverse population since the founding.
IMO she is angry she is about to lose her seat, probably in run off in dec. But she is losing her seat because her people are angry with her, she ought to accept their judgment with some dignity. She put party political ahead of the state, although is she had got the amendment to make Obama's health care promises law and something like the pipeline, then she might be looking at an easy win.