
I couldn't think of who Archer was reminding me of on his killing rampage then it hit me with no eyebrows he had a striking resemblance to Craig.
But these are things we have no control over. It's important to have achievable goals. Nothing we do or say is going to make an ounce of difference to SF's reviews or box office. But we can counter lies (that QOS was a resounding success, that Brosnan killed the franchise until Craig revitalised it) with facts. Keep hammering away at those myths wherever you find them and it is possible for even a fairly small number of people to affect public consciousness. Why do you think governments and lobbying firms employ people to post on social media sites and internet comments boards?FormerBondFan wrote:First things first, we're going to need a whole chunks of horrid reviews worse than QOS before it reaches the UK.
The way people are getting hyped over that d**n stupid beepy trailer I think he's gonna staybjmdds wrote:If Cr-egg stays I want the franchise to end now, but Eon will keep churning out as many films as they can so that the minions can rush to see them.......we need a LTK response to Bond 23 at the box office.
If DC's going to stay, I say we should campaign for this thing to be the next James Bond. Shaken.....since you're a gamer, I would assume you know who this is.shaken not stirred wrote:The way people are getting hyped over that d**n stupid beepy trailer I think he's gonna stay, all the same crap on there he's what fleming envisioned, this is real bond, this is a film that's trying too hard, cregg will never be bond even if he stays to do something stupid like 12 bond films, you put caville or jackman in that trailer you'd turn a 24 carrot rotting turd into 24 carrot gold (and put an old man back as q instead of someone who looks like they work in pc world), the way craig said bond james bond didn't have any finesse to it either, every other actor even Dalton (no offense to Dalton fans) atleast somehow managed to say bond james bond a bit better than craig, you need to get that bond, james bond part right just like any actor who plays batman has to say I'm batman properly or it comes off as crap, batman strikes fear into people just like bonds supposed to show class and be suave, craig sounds like he regrets saying bond james bond, it's the d**n top title and you're the best agent keanu reeves could've given a better performance.
Not sure what the enemy is but it looks similar to an enemy out of a quake game.FormerBondFan wrote:
If DC's going to stay, I say we should campaign for this thing to be the next James Bond. Shaken.....since you're a gamer, I would assume you know who this is.
It is from Quake, and this monster is known as the Shambler.shaken not stirred wrote:Not sure what the enemy is but it looks similar to an enemy out of a quake game.FormerBondFan wrote:
If DC's going to stay, I say we should campaign for this thing to be the next James Bond. Shaken.....since you're a gamer, I would assume you know who this is.
bjmdds wrote:After 30 days in the USA, with 3-D and Imax effects added on, Garfield's non-Amazing film is $71 MILLION behind Tobey's last Spider-Man 3 film in the USA.(30-Day Total: $245,327,116 vs. 30-Day Total: $316,005,192) So much for success of this here. It might slip to 8th or 9th this weekend as the Bat continues to soar. So much for the need of a reboot. Pascal was wrong againFBF, she is as much the culprit as the rotten green vegetable at Eon.
Yes, but let's not forget Anne Karenina will be Rated R (not to mentioned having a limited release), and most artistic films tend to get this rating. I wouldn't be surprised if Lincoln will get the same rating. It would be nice if we have another wide release on the 9th.Spread the word to not see Bond 23 but see Anna Karenina instead, right FBF?
Worldwide, we have 5 films surpassing the $600 million mark. Domestically, 9 films have surpass QOS' $168 million in the US, and 8 of them went over $200 million.bjmdds wrote:How many 2012 films have worldwide grosses so far over $600 million?
You don't think it's going to beat TBU's numbers, would it?bjmdds wrote:Let's hope The Bourne Legacy gets some action.
Why? It was trying to copy the Bourne films that led to the ruination of Bond in the first place. If this one underperforms, the rationale for the reboot (that Bourne represents the future of the spy thriller) goes out of the window.bjmdds wrote:Let's hope The Bourne Legacy gets some action.
Plus, Matt Damon is not in here so I like to see this gross lower than TBU.Kristatos wrote:Why? It was trying to copy the Bourne films that led to the ruination of Bond in the first place. If this one underperforms, the rationale for the reboot (that Bourne represents the future of the spy thriller) goes out of the window.bjmdds wrote:Let's hope The Bourne Legacy gets some action.
The ONLY thing that has led to the ruination of the franchise is the lust of DC by an enamored owner of Eon. She fantasizes about him naked and went against everyone else's judgment to give him the role.Kristatos wrote:Why? It was trying to copy the Bourne films that led to the ruination of Bond in the first place. If this one underperforms, the rationale for the reboot (that Bourne represents the future of the spy thriller) goes out of the window.bjmdds wrote:Let's hope The Bourne Legacy gets some action.
katied wrote:Sorry I haven't been around but I'm getting ready to go on a Alaskan cruise.Not sure how much access I'll have to DCINB while I'm on the ship but might try to post at least once while I'm aboard.
This is their third attempt at making Batman Begins, down to Bond Manner burning down.The Saint 007 wrote:The horrible attempts of the Bond producers trying to mimic Bourne, has only made the Bourne series look more superior as a result. By the looks of the Skyfall trailers, the film seems to be a bit influenced by Batman. Once upon a time everybody wanted to be like James Bond, and now James Bond wants to be like everybody else.