Bros on Craig

Post by **The Sweeney** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:21 pm

carl stromberg wrote:
Skywalker wrote:
Captain Nash wrote:As The Sweeney mentioned the internet wasn't commonplace in 1995.
And if I was on the net during Brosnans time, I would only join a site like BrosnanNotBond after 2002.
Luckily there's Mi6 forums.
You seem to spend a lot of time on here for someone who prefers MI6.

MI6 must be a thrilling place to hang out if the post counts of our tiny group of Craig groupies are anything to go by. Thanks for the traffic and your help in making this the most entertaining Bond forum on the internet.

I may actually agree with you on the last bit.....

Post by **Skywalker** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:53 pm

Captain Nash wrote:Well it may seem that I do, but you really shouldn't assume things.

Just going by your OWN little message.

Jermaine76 · Post by **Jermaine76** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:04 pm

stockslivevan wrote:When Daniel Craig is complimented by his predecessors as a good James Bond, does their opinion not matter? They all played Bond, they know the role well enough to believe who is right or wrong for it.

Say one of them says "Daniel Craig is wrong for the role" you'd all go throwing a DCINB party. But when they say the opposite, is it acknowledged or completely ignored as if their judgement doesn't hold water?

Out of respect, they're not going to diss him in public. C'mon now.

Post by **English Agent** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:26 pm

Jermaine76 wrote:
stockslivevan wrote:When Daniel Craig is complimented by his predecessors as a good James Bond, does their opinion not matter? They all played Bond, they know the role well enough to believe who is right or wrong for it.

Say one of them says "Daniel Craig is wrong for the role" you'd all go throwing a DCINB party. But when they say the opposite, is it acknowledged or completely ignored as if their judgement doesn't hold water?
Out of respect, they're not going to diss him in public. C'mon now.

True......................didn't George Lazenby once diss Pierce Brosnan
as Bond?

stockslivevan · Post by **stockslivevan** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:41 pm

Jermaine76 wrote:
stockslivevan wrote:When Daniel Craig is complimented by his predecessors as a good James Bond, does their opinion not matter? They all played Bond, they know the role well enough to believe who is right or wrong for it.

Say one of them says "Daniel Craig is wrong for the role" you'd all go throwing a DCINB party. But when they say the opposite, is it acknowledged or completely ignored as if their judgement doesn't hold water?
Out of respect, they're not going to diss him in public. C'mon now.

Exactly Jermaine, if he felt otherwise of course he'd say nothing at all because you know the saying "if you have nothing good to say, don't say anything".

The only people he's been trashing on are EON, I don't understand where some people get the idea that he hates Craig as well.

Commander 0077 · Post by **Commander 0077** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:02 am

The Sweeney wrote:
carl stromberg wrote:
Skywalker wrote:
Captain Nash wrote:As The Sweeney mentioned the internet wasn't commonplace in 1995.
And if I was on the net during Brosnans time, I would only join a site like BrosnanNotBond after 2002.
Luckily there's Mi6 forums.
You seem to spend a lot of time on here for someone who prefers MI6.

MI6 must be a thrilling place to hang out if the post counts of our tiny group of Craig groupies are anything to go by. Thanks for the traffic and your help in making this the most entertaining Bond forum on the internet.
I may actually agree with you on the last bit.....

Yesh, it's the most entertaining Bond forum for many reasons, including there are some Double-Os who are willing to stand firm (toot toot) for (what we feel and deduce from the books and films) the Real Bond

, plus the opposing viewpoint is welcome here, and there's not much trashing (if any

)

Post by **carl stromberg** » Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:45 pm

I keep thinking this topic referes to the pop group Bros and their views on Daniel Craig.