Someone saying "every Bond film except for the Craig ones suck" is nothing BUT trolling.And the guy was not trolling. He was putting forward his opinion. Since when was that ever trolling?

Someone saying "every Bond film except for the Craig ones suck" is nothing BUT trolling.And the guy was not trolling. He was putting forward his opinion. Since when was that ever trolling?
If anyone went on MI6 and called their forum a 'bitch fest', they would be terminated at once-amundo. You know it, Stocks knows it, DogBond knows it, I know it, etc. Stating your own PERSONAL opinion is fine;however, telling others that they should get over the past and move on and agree with the rest of you Craig-heads is another thing. You never seem to grasp that major difference Sweeney. How many of 'my kind' are left at MI6?The Sweeney wrote:His original post outlined his own opinion, and was not aggressive at all. He only stooped to the level of calling this place a `bitch fest' once he was accused of lying and being a teenager.bjmdds wrote:Debate is great;however, a pro-Craigger trying to TEACH us something about the Bond franchise? Calling this forum a 'bitch fest' is real clever? Really now.The tolerance level at your 'other home' does not exist beyond 2 or 3 anti-Craig posts. By the way, USA network just premiered your's and Jimbo's favorite Bond film, CR. It will be on for 4 consecutive evenings. I await to see how much longer after that. USA tossed out a bunch of dough for those rights I bet.
Can you not see how the behaviour here towards a new member with an opposing view is no different to what you accuse MI6 of...?
Jimmyjazz LOVES the fact that he has supporters here, even if there are only 2 of them .... their ego-stroking and telling him he's right is what's keeping him hereIf anyone went on MI6 and called their forum a 'bitch fest', they would be terminated at once-amundo. You know it, Stocks knows it, DogBond knows it, I know it, etc. Stating your own PERSONAL opinion is fine;however, telling others that they should get over the past and move on and agree with the rest of you Craig-heads is another thing. You never seem to grasp that major difference Sweeney. How many of 'my kind' are left at MI6?
He only called this place a bitch fest after the abuse was hurled at him. His initial post was friendly, and did not go into this forum with guns a' blazing. I'm not suprised he retorted with these comments after being accused of lying and being a teenager. You started similar provoking threads on MI6, then slagged the place off for being narrow minded when your posts were met with similar hostility. Yet now you are doing the exact same thing. Practice what you preach, and all that.....bjmdds wrote: If anyone went on MI6 and called their forum a 'bitch fest', they would be terminated at once-amundo.
Why? It's called an opinion. The post was well constructed, and even sympathised at the beginning with your view point. And all he said was give CR a chance, watch it again. Heaven knows people can change their minds on things, one has to look no further than katied right here. She is living proof that people can change their opinions.bjmdds wrote: You know it, Stocks knows it, DogBond knows it, I know it, etc. Stating your own PERSONAL opinion is fine;however, telling others that they should get over the past and move on and agree with the rest of you Craig-heads is another thing.
Ego stroking? No, its called sticking up for someone who entered this forum in a friendly way, despite his opposing viewpoint, then got slagged off childishly for doing so.katied wrote:Jimmyjazz LOVES the fact that he has supporters here, even if there are only 2 of them .... their ego-stroking and telling him he's right is what's keeping him hereIf anyone went on MI6 and called their forum a 'bitch fest', they would be terminated at once-amundo. You know it, Stocks knows it, DogBond knows it, I know it, etc. Stating your own PERSONAL opinion is fine;however, telling others that they should get over the past and move on and agree with the rest of you Craig-heads is another thing. You never seem to grasp that major difference Sweeney. How many of 'my kind' are left at MI6?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I agree, that comment on its own here would be trolling, but that wasn't all he wrote.katied wrote:Someone saying "every Bond film except for the Craig ones suck" is nothing BUT trolling.And the guy was not trolling. He was putting forward his opinion. Since when was that ever trolling?
No? Looking back on the OP, perhaps calling it a troll post was a bit strong, but the thread title and this paragraphThe Sweeney wrote:He only called this place a bitch fest after the abuse was hurled at him. His initial post was friendly, and did not go into this forum with guns a' blazing.
are pretty much designed to get people's backs up. So yeah, perhaps I overreacted, for which I apologise, but to Jimmyjazz, I say please understand that this board has a history of being trolled by people expressing similar viewpoints to yours, often considerably less politely, in addition to the way people who don't like the new direction get dogpiled on other Bond forums. I see it as a form of bullying, designed to enforce conformity to one particular viewpoint where multiple viewpoints exist. For me, it brings back unpleasant memories of the outbreaks of mass hysteria that followed the death of Princess Diana and 9/11 (though obviously on a smaller scale), when groupthink dictated how we were "supposed" to feel, and which eventually led to violence, such as people being beaten up in record stores for not buying copies of Elton John's mawkfest. Some of us don't like having our opinions dictated to us by others.jimmyjazz wrote:I think the members of this forum need to face up to it. Your old god is dead and thank you Mr Craig for that. I can’t believe anyone could sit through an old Bond film without realising how bad they actually are. Casino Royale had a depth never before seen in a Bond film it’s as simple as that.
Exactly. We don't like being told "You HAVE to like Craig, or there's the door." So Jimyjazz' coming on here and saying what he said, and *getting* the reaction he got(except from a few peopleI see it as a form of bullying, designed to enforce conformity to one particular viewpoint where multiple viewpoints exist.
katied wrote:Exactly. We don't like being told "You HAVE to like Craig, or there's the door." So Jimyjazz' coming on here and saying what he said, and *getting* the reaction he got(except from a few peopleI see it as a form of bullying, designed to enforce conformity to one particular viewpoint where multiple viewpoints exist.) should not have surprised him.
No accounting for good taste. Maybe he's my twin brother I never knew I had.bjmdds wrote:CR transformed you EXACTLY as it did Jimbo. You both have IDENTICAL viewpoints since CR was released. Are you sure he is not related to you in some way Sweeney?
There you go. It ain't all bad here. You've had 2 decent responses from anti-Craigers here - 007 and Kristatos.jimmyjazz wrote:katied wrote:Exactly. We don't like being told "You HAVE to like Craig, or there's the door." So Jimyjazz' coming on here and saying what he said, and *getting* the reaction he got(except from a few peopleI see it as a form of bullying, designed to enforce conformity to one particular viewpoint where multiple viewpoints exist.) should not have surprised him.
Hello there
Please don't paraphrase what I said katied. Use my real words and you will find I am less antagonistic than you would like to believe.
Fair enough. Decent comment.katied wrote:It's a free country. But if we(the anti-Craigs) want to dislike Craig, that's our perogative. And if you come in here and expect us to start liking Craig, you've got another thing coming. Sorry.