![Image](http://www.newmexiconuts.net/catalog/tumbleweed.jpg)
![Cheers :cheers:](./images/smilies/cheers.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Captain Nash wrote:A quick look into the future here.
![]()
Yet it's ok for folk on here to post childish, silly pics that are supposed to be Craig lookalikes. That's ok, is it?Kristatos wrote:Posts like the OP make me want QOS to be a critical and commercial failure. Or failing that, for Nash to hate it, so that he has a crisis of faith. But of course that would never happen, because even if it was a shot-for-shot remake of DAD, Nash, Sweeney et al would somehow convince themselves that it was a work of cinematic genius.
Of coursebecause even if it was a shot-for-shot remake of DAD, Nash, Sweeney et al would somehow convince themselves that it was a work of cinematic genius.
Looks more like the Official Daniel Craig merchandising and memorabilia store.Captain Nash wrote:A quick look into the future here.
But of course.The Sweeney wrote:Yet it's ok for folk on here to post childish, silly pics that are supposed to be Craig lookalikes. That's ok, is it?
Yes, it's true, you have. I should probably remove your name from that. Not so sure about Nash, though.The Sweeney wrote: And if QOS is anything remotely like DAD, I will be the first person on here to condemn the film to hell. I've already gone on record saying that before on here, and on MI6.
So normally you don't, which means you do want it to be a critical and commercial success.Kristatos wrote:Posts like the OP make me want QOS to be a critical and commercial failure.
I'm not pro-Craig, but I want the Bond franchise to continue. Daniel Craig isn't going to be Bond forever, and besides, I want the film to be good, even if I don't like the choice of lead actor.stockslivevan wrote:So normally you don't, which means you do want it to be a critical and commercial success.Kristatos wrote:Posts like the OP make me want QOS to be a critical and commercial failure.Wow, I had no idea you recently became a pro-Craig. Welcome to the cult!
![]()
Perhaps you should change your username to Le Chiffre.stockslivevan wrote:I know, I was just busting balls.
stockslivevan wrote:The most famous and well known Anti-Craig site has 300 registered members with 12 people posting and six consistently showing up on a daily basis is a revolution?
Good luck.
You mean there are others? What sort of "James Bond" would anger people so much that they are motivated to start their own sites!stockslivevan wrote:The most famous and well known Anti-Craig site has 300 registered members with 12 people posting and six consistently showing up on a daily basis is a revolution?
Good luck.