The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

General Bond discussion from Sean Connery to Pierce Brosnan
Post Reply
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 13274
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

Enquire magazine agrees with me: https://www.esquire.com/uk/culture/film ... ond-actor/

Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk

"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
User avatar
James
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 1659
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: On Her Majesty's Secret Service
Favorite Movies: George A Romero's Dawn Of The Dead
Silent Running
Harold and Maude
Location: Europe and Outer Space

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by James »

Hollywood Reporter said this tonight...
https://view.mail.hollywoodreporter.com ... 4002780830

And as we go into the weekend, there is still no official word on Bond. Two different outlets have reported two different names at this point. And we here at HV have heard that there now two mystery actors that have tested, not one like initially thought. And we were told that these two thespians are notable and established names, above the level of the still-rising likes of Callum Turner and company.
No idea if this is true but I hope so because the three alleged candidates are very underwhelming. Who would be 'above the level' of a Callum Turner but in that age bracket? Nicholas Hoult? Aaron Taylor-Johnson? Is Elordi still in the mix? I have no idea. I wonder if they are having trouble reaching a consensus because you have two veteran producers, the Amazon top brass and a famous powerful director who will all have their two pence on the casting. Plus Nina Gold. It was a lot easier with Casino Royale because Barbara wore the trousers and it was her decision.
"I can't do that superhero stuff" Daniel Craig
User avatar
James
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 1659
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: On Her Majesty's Secret Service
Favorite Movies: George A Romero's Dawn Of The Dead
Silent Running
Harold and Maude
Location: Europe and Outer Space

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by James »

Kristatos wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2026 5:57 pm Enquire magazine agrees with me: https://www.esquire.com/uk/culture/film ... ond-actor/

Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk
There is a theory that Amazon can't make a decision and are leaking the contenders to test public reaction to them. Sounds a bit unlikely but you never know.
"I can't do that superhero stuff" Daniel Craig
Jake
Lieutenant
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2025 3:21 am

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Jake »

Apparently one of the mystery actors is Robert Pattinson. It makes sense, given he's coming off Dune 3 with Villeneuve and is an established name without being a huge star.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie ... 236749903/

I have to say, I think Pattinson immediately becomes my preferred choice of the known contenders, as I could easily see him in the role.

The fact that he's played a role as high-profile as Batman doesn't seem like it would be a deal-breaker in today's Hollywood, as it feels silly to still be trying to think in terms of what would've made the most sense in a year like 1968 or 1986.

Edit: Ah, and as soon as I post it seems Nicholas Hoult has been revealed as the other mysterious contender:

https://deadline.com/2026/11/robert-pat ... 237216183/

I could see Hoult in the role as well and this news helps restore my hope of Villeneuve wanting a more traditional Bond that is closer to Brosnan or Dalton than Craig.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 15071
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Image This lunacy will never end it seems and all of these characters are 36 now and are NOT Bond. Holt and the Cedrick Diggory of Harry Potter fame is a joke as Bond as well. Pascal should let us cast this film. It would take 30 minutes!
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 15071
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Image Nothing compares to him! The 5 punks discussed are kiddies compared to Aidan Turner, who is 7 years older but looks better than Connery did in DAF.
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 15071
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Image Are they kidding?
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 15071
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Image The on screen presence of paint drying on a wall.
Image
Jake
Lieutenant
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2025 3:21 am

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Jake »

I'd love to see Aidan Turner cast and feel like it should've happened in 2016 after his role in And Then There Were None generated some 007 buzz. However, it seems like they're looking for an actor that's at least 6'1" or 6'2" and is similar to the description of the books (blue eyes, comma of hair, etc)

Image

In addition to his work with Villeneuve, I feel like Pattinson probably has an edge in that he knows how to headline a blockbuster and his role in Tenet already drew a lot of Bond comparisons at the time.

Ultimately, if producers were able to sell someone like Craig in the role to moviegoers, I don't think it will be all that difficult with a new actor. I'd just prefer it be someone that fits the kind of tall, dark, and handsome mold most fans still associate with the character.
Jake
Lieutenant
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2025 3:21 am

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Jake »

Image

Of course, Hoult also has some blockbuster experience under his belt and has the advantage of being at the prime age of 36.

Theo James is reportedly still in the mix as well, so it's interesting they're willing to test actors who are already in their early 40s. Perhaps they finally realized that most actors today in their late 20s or early 30s look FAR younger than Connery did back when he was cast?
Post Reply