James Bond is no fun anymore
- John Drake
- Commander
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: Watching the first twenty James Bond films somewhere...
James Bond is no fun anymore
http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie ... viewer=416
Quantum of Solace
The best parts of "Quantum of Solace," the new James Bond film, are the stylized-as-usual opening credits, which promise a lush and explosive evening, and the familiar gun-barrel bit with the classic 007 theme at the end.
These are the only parts that feel like a James Bond film. The rest is filler, which means the entire actual movie is filler. It is incomprehensible, blandly motivated, and flat-out dull. I’m one of those moviegoers who don’t have a great emotional stake in 007 but believe that if a Bond flick isn’t going to be awesomely ridiculous or ridiculously awesome, there’s little point to it.
The series had in recent years gotten bloated and decadent, though that was more a reflection on the weak scripts than on the traditional Bond style. So, with 2006’s Casino Royale and now Quantum of Solace, which is more like Casino Royale Vol. 2, we get a grim, stripped-down Bond (Daniel Craig). As many have pointed out, the Bond series has rebooted by imitating one of its own imitators, the Bourne series with Matt Damon. Where’s the fun in that? Where’s the escapism, the ludicrous plots, the stunts that prompt gasps and laughter? Recasting Bond as a gritty football hooligan in a suit is like performing Wagner with a symphony of kazoos.
This Bond kills assassins by stabbing them in the leg, then shuffling away with a scowl; Sean Connery was no less brutal, but somehow added suavity and humor to the violence. It doesn’t help that the carnage’s orchestrator is hack director Marc Forster, who skips from genre to genre (Finding Neverland, Stranger Than Fiction, The Kite Runner) without offering any particular point of view. Here, Forster splinters the action into so many unreadable shards. When I don’t care about what’s happening, that’s one thing. When I can’t see what’s happening, that’s another thing. When I don’t care that I can’t see what’s happening, that’s movie death.
Bond’s mission here is to crack the terrorist organization Quantum and avenge the previous Bond girl (Eva Green) who died in Casino Royale. Sounds simple, but the Bond movies aren’t happy unless they complicate things unnecessarily, so there are double-crosses and globe-hopping, all of which plays as padding. In other Bond movies, we at least had absurd set pieces or eye candy to pass the time. But the Bond girls have gotten duller along with their surroundings, as have their names (“Strawberry Fields” is the best the writers can come up with here). And who doesn’t miss those glorious Ken Adam sets, instead of the grunting fisticuffs played out in squalid hotel rooms that we get here?
Despite its promisingly oblique title, Quantum of Solace is all on the surface, and those who honk on about Bond’s complex emotional progress in this movie are delusional; Daniel Craig is a stiff in a suit here, and it occurred to me that, between these new straight-faced 007 films and anguished epics like The Dark Knight and the upcoming Watchmen, fanboys increasingly prefer their thrills somber and “realistic.” A fanciful throwback like Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, with its much-derided nuke-the-fridge gag, doesn’t fit well in this clenched new environment, and neither would the old James Bond.
But if "Quantum of Solace" refuses to offer style, vision, or excitement, why is it there? Why, other than a big paycheck for Columbia and MGM every few years and a regular fix for 007 die-hards, is this series still going?
Quantum of Solace
The best parts of "Quantum of Solace," the new James Bond film, are the stylized-as-usual opening credits, which promise a lush and explosive evening, and the familiar gun-barrel bit with the classic 007 theme at the end.
These are the only parts that feel like a James Bond film. The rest is filler, which means the entire actual movie is filler. It is incomprehensible, blandly motivated, and flat-out dull. I’m one of those moviegoers who don’t have a great emotional stake in 007 but believe that if a Bond flick isn’t going to be awesomely ridiculous or ridiculously awesome, there’s little point to it.
The series had in recent years gotten bloated and decadent, though that was more a reflection on the weak scripts than on the traditional Bond style. So, with 2006’s Casino Royale and now Quantum of Solace, which is more like Casino Royale Vol. 2, we get a grim, stripped-down Bond (Daniel Craig). As many have pointed out, the Bond series has rebooted by imitating one of its own imitators, the Bourne series with Matt Damon. Where’s the fun in that? Where’s the escapism, the ludicrous plots, the stunts that prompt gasps and laughter? Recasting Bond as a gritty football hooligan in a suit is like performing Wagner with a symphony of kazoos.
This Bond kills assassins by stabbing them in the leg, then shuffling away with a scowl; Sean Connery was no less brutal, but somehow added suavity and humor to the violence. It doesn’t help that the carnage’s orchestrator is hack director Marc Forster, who skips from genre to genre (Finding Neverland, Stranger Than Fiction, The Kite Runner) without offering any particular point of view. Here, Forster splinters the action into so many unreadable shards. When I don’t care about what’s happening, that’s one thing. When I can’t see what’s happening, that’s another thing. When I don’t care that I can’t see what’s happening, that’s movie death.
Bond’s mission here is to crack the terrorist organization Quantum and avenge the previous Bond girl (Eva Green) who died in Casino Royale. Sounds simple, but the Bond movies aren’t happy unless they complicate things unnecessarily, so there are double-crosses and globe-hopping, all of which plays as padding. In other Bond movies, we at least had absurd set pieces or eye candy to pass the time. But the Bond girls have gotten duller along with their surroundings, as have their names (“Strawberry Fields” is the best the writers can come up with here). And who doesn’t miss those glorious Ken Adam sets, instead of the grunting fisticuffs played out in squalid hotel rooms that we get here?
Despite its promisingly oblique title, Quantum of Solace is all on the surface, and those who honk on about Bond’s complex emotional progress in this movie are delusional; Daniel Craig is a stiff in a suit here, and it occurred to me that, between these new straight-faced 007 films and anguished epics like The Dark Knight and the upcoming Watchmen, fanboys increasingly prefer their thrills somber and “realistic.” A fanciful throwback like Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, with its much-derided nuke-the-fridge gag, doesn’t fit well in this clenched new environment, and neither would the old James Bond.
But if "Quantum of Solace" refuses to offer style, vision, or excitement, why is it there? Why, other than a big paycheck for Columbia and MGM every few years and a regular fix for 007 die-hards, is this series still going?
"He is very good-looking" Vesper Lynd
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
So how did it become the second biggest grossing film of last year?John Drake wrote:A fanciful throwback like Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, with its much-derided nuke-the-fridge gag, doesn’t fit well in this clenched new environment
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
- The Sweeney
- 003
- Posts: 3388
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
- Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
- Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
Because it said `Indiana Jones' on the tin...Kristatos wrote:So how did it become the second biggest grossing film of last year?John Drake wrote:A fanciful throwback like Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, with its much-derided nuke-the-fridge gag, doesn’t fit well in this clenched new environment
- carl stromberg
- Ministry of Defence
- Posts: 4447
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:15 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: The Spy Who Loved Me
- Favorite Movies: Amicus compendium horror films
It's a Gift
A Night At The Opera
The Return of the Pink Panther
Sons of the Desert - Location: The Duck Inn
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
That's a tremendous insult to all football hooligans that is, comparing them with Daniel Craig's James Bond.Recasting Bond as a gritty football hooligan in a suit is like performing Wagner with a symphony of kazoos.
Bring back Bond!
- Felix Leiter
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:21 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
John Drake wrote:Despite its promisingly oblique title, Quantum of Solace is all on the surface, and those who honk on about Bond’s complex emotional progress in this movie are delusional...if "Quantum of Solace" refuses to offer style, vision, or excitement, why is it there?
-
- Agent
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
- Location: America
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
YEP!Except there are movies series that make Jones look out of touch.No more keeping up with the Joneses.Or 007.The Sweeney wrote:
Because it said `Indiana Jones' on the tin...
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
Yes, if Indy is so out of touch with the zeitgeist, I'd have thought his name would be a liability rather than an asset. You'd expect the film to do Rocky Balboa numbers at the box office, not come second only to The Dark Knight in the annual chart.oscartheman wrote:YEP!Except there are movies series that make Jones look out of touch.No more keeping up with the Joneses.Or 007.The Sweeney wrote:
Because it said `Indiana Jones' on the tin...
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
- The Sweeney
- 003
- Posts: 3388
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
- Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
- Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
Not really. Indy as a franchise is as big as Star Wars, especially with Spielberg and Lucas associated with it. The Rocky franchise doesn't compare.Kristatos wrote: Yes, if Indy is so out of touch with the zeitgeist, I'd have thought his name would be a liability rather than an asset. You'd expect the film to do Rocky Balboa numbers at the box office, not come second only to The Dark Knight in the annual chart.
-
- Agent
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
- Location: America
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
I meant out of touch with the old Jones and new action adventures filling the void better.
- John Drake
- Commander
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: Watching the first twenty James Bond films somewhere...
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
Indy took a bit of suspension belief. But some of the stuff in that was no worse than Bond surviving a jump from a plane with Camille with only one parachute and the two of them only getting a few bumps and bruises
- Dr. No
- 006
- Posts: 3453
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:28 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: Dr. No
- Favorite Movies: Indiana Jones & the Last Crusade
SpiderMan 2
Empire Strikes Back
Shawshank Redemption - Location: Crab Key
Re: James Bond is no fun anymore
SNAP!John Drake wrote:http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie ... viewer=416
The series had in recent years gotten bloated and decadent, though that was more a reflection on the weak scripts than on the traditional Bond style. So, with 2006’s Casino Royale and now Quantum of Solace, which is more like Casino Royale Vol. 2, we get a grim, stripped-down Bond (Daniel Craig). As many have pointed out, the Bond series has rebooted by imitating one of its own imitators, the Bourne series with Matt Damon. Where’s the fun in that? Where’s the escapism, the ludicrous plots, the stunts that prompt gasps and laughter? Recasting Bond as a gritty football hooligan in a suit is like performing Wagner with a symphony of kazoos.
I do remember think after Cr that Bond was no fun any more. Depressing in fact.
Chief of Staff, 007's gone round the bend. Says someone's been trying to feed him a poisoned banana. Fellow's lost his nerve. Been in the hospital too long. Better call him home.