Page 2 of 2

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:38 pm
by FormerBondFan
Dr. No wrote:Seagal is starting to look more and more like the guy him did a MADTV impersonation of him

Image

Image


how can anyone take Seagal seriously or have the gall to suggest his name in the same breath as with bond?

The guy was bad cliche action star in the early 80s and went down hill fast. Chuck Noris and Jackie Chan have more acting skill than Seagal.

I did like Under Siege but most of his work is a bad B moive spy stuff. Secret CIA killer who just wants to retire... In a world where the bag guys will not leave him alone ;)
When is Seagal going to retire?

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:11 pm
by Dr. No
Kristatos wrote:
Blowfeld wrote:Very disquieting. Since it is you saying that, my first reaction is to defend Steven. Something along the lines of 'Seagal's edgy, wolfish common touch should be fine in the "Casino Royale" remake.' ;)
That's a bit petty, innit?
Image
Well what did you expect that is Blowfeld to the right in the tux. :) ;) :D :007:


Only kidding!!! Don't ban me dude! ;)

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:14 pm
by Dr. No
FormerBondFan wrote:
When is Seagal going to retire?
Is he still making movies? Last one i heard about was years a go in a super bowl ad. Exit wounds or something. teamed up with a rapper.

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:26 pm
by FormerBondFan
Dr. No wrote:
FormerBondFan wrote:
When is Seagal going to retire?
Is he still making movies? Last one i heard about was years a go in a super bowl ad. Exit wounds or something. teamed up with a rapper.
The last theatrical movie he did was 2002's Half Past Dead. He mostly does direct-to-video movies these days.

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:29 pm
by katied
Direct to movie video movies are,by their nature dreadful(Pierce Brosnan's recent straight to video movie anyone?)

sorry Pierce, it's not your best work :P

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:54 am
by Blowfeld
Kristatos wrote:
Blowfeld wrote:Very disquieting. Since it is you saying that, my first reaction is to defend Steven. Something along the lines of 'Seagal's edgy, wolfish common touch should be fine in the "Casino Royale" remake.' ;)
That's a bit petty, innit?
Tongue in cheek :wink:

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:15 am
by Captain Nash
Blowfeld wrote:
Kristatos wrote:
Blowfeld wrote:Very disquieting. Since it is you saying that, my first reaction is to defend Steven. Something along the lines of 'Seagal's edgy, wolfish common touch should be fine in the "Casino Royale" remake.' ;)
That's a bit petty, innit?
Tongue in cheek :wink:
Still cheap blowers, and from a mod to. How did you get the mod nod? One has to ask.
Tongue in cheek mate...and all that. :wink:

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:46 pm
by Blowfeld
This from the chap who deified Daniel in another thread :shock: :wink:

A rare concurrence of circumstances have us unanimously agreeing that Steven Seagal is an inappropriate choice. The stars must be aligned just right ;)

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:54 am
by FormerBondFan
If Seagal does a Bond movie, it would mostly be direct-to-video.

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:14 am
by katied
FormerBondFan wrote:If Seagal does a Bond movie, it would mostly be direct-to-video.
With Babs and her brother running EON, sadly, anything is possible :shock:

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:53 am
by FormerBondFan
katied wrote:
FormerBondFan wrote:If Seagal does a Bond movie, it would mostly be direct-to-video.
With Babs and her brother running EON, sadly, anything is possible :shock:
Then a Seagal Bond movie will make less money.

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:11 pm
by Blowfeld
You might get a chuckle from these jpgs from Movie Moron

Image
Image

Re: "Sir" Steven Seagal

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:31 am
by X3C
FormerBondFan wrote:
katied wrote:
FormerBondFan wrote:If Seagal does a Bond movie, it would mostly be direct-to-video.
With Babs and her brother running EON, sadly, anything is possible :shock:
Then a Seagal Bond movie will make less money.

his movie roles are "bond lite with or without women"that goes straight to dvd. :007:

Typical. A secret agent being set up... how many times did he play that kind of role?

How about "the man with the golden gun" straight to dvd remake? this time bond played by Seagal does the 'kick-ass' aikido moves himself and not defended by 2 girls in school uniform.