Brosnan knew what he wanted to do with Bond, and he everything he got done was swimming against the producers current.Captain Nash wrote:Yes, but he did make four films.Double O's wrote:GE is the best of the Brosna lot-- again-he did not have a good bit to work with during his tenure-so the real sad aspect is that we never got to see what Brosnan could have done with the right film...
00
If he hasn't found his mark by then, well he never will.
GE is probably his best, which means why did we have to endure three more after that.
TND had major script rewrites as they were making it, how is anyone supposed to work with that. And he did, stealing any moment he could get to build up his Bond.
Losing Cubby cost more than we knew. I think under Cubby Brosnan’s movies would have been better.